Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A High-throughput Assay for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity by Automated Phenotypic Profiling of Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: March 14, 2019
Integrating computer prediction systems with in vitro methods towards a better understanding of toxicology
1Marlin Consultancy, Carlton, Bedford, UK. martin.d.barratt@btinternet.com
Abstract:
Structure Activity Relationships (SARs) or Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships (QSARs) form the basis of most computer prediction systems in toxicology. The underlying premise of SARs and QSARs is that the properties of a chemical are implicit in its molecular structure. For an SAR or QSAR to be valid and reliable, the dependent property for all of the chemicals covered by the relationship has to be elicited by a mechanism which is both common to the set of chemicals as well as relevant to that dependent property. Similar principles must also be applied to the development of in vitro alternatives to animal tests if those methods are to be reliable. A number of ways in which computer prediction systems and in vitro toxicology can complement each other in the development of alternatives to live animal experiments are described.
More Related Videos
05:47In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
16:02Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023