Related Experiment Videos
Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners
1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences and Center for Comparative Neuroscience, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA.
Ear and Hearing
|February 26, 1999
Summary
Amplitude compression did not significantly impact speech recognition for cochlear implant users. However, reducing dynamic range impaired phoneme recognition, especially in noise, highlighting the need for improved cochlear implant technology.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Speech Science
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CIs) require sound compression due to limited electric dynamic range.
- Understanding the impact of compression and dynamic range reduction on speech recognition is crucial for CI users.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how amplitude compression and dynamic range reduction affect phoneme recognition in quiet and noise for CI listeners.
- To compare CI listener performance with normal-hearing listeners.
Main Methods:
- Four CI users of the Nucleus-22 SPEAK processor participated.
- Amplitude compression was varied by Q-value; dynamic range was reduced by adjusting threshold and comfortable levels.
- Phoneme recognition was tested with vowels and consonants in quiet and noise across various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and electrode counts (20, 10, 4).
Main Results:
- Amplitude compression did not significantly affect phoneme recognition.
- Dynamic range reduction marginally impacted quiet recognition but significantly degraded noise recognition.
- Performance with 20 and 10 electrodes was similar; 4 electrodes yielded poorer results.
- CI users required higher SNRs and scored lower than normal-hearing listeners.
Conclusions:
- Amplitude compression has minimal effect, but dynamic range reduction significantly impairs speech recognition, particularly for vowels in noise.
- Findings may be specific to spectral peak-extracting processors like SPEAK.
- More than four electrodes are likely needed for optimal speech recognition in noise.
- A performance gap persists between CI and normal-hearing listeners, necessitating improved CI designs and fitting strategies.