Isotope ratio determination in boron analysis

Traditionally, boron (B) isotope ratios have been determined using thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) and, to some extent, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). Both TIMS and SIMS use a high-resolution mass analyzer, but differ in analyte ionization methods. TIMS uses electrons from a hot filament, whereas SIMS employs an energetic primary ion beam of Ga+, Cs+, or O- for analyte ionization. TIMS can be used in negative or positive ion modes with high sensitivity and precision of B isotope ratio determination. However, isobaric interferences may be a problem, if the sample is not well purified and/or memory of the previous sample is not removed. Time-consuming sample preparation, analyte (B) purification, and sample determination processes limit the applications of TIMS for routine analyses. SIMS can determine B and its isotope ratio in intact solid samples without destroying them, but has poorer resolution and sensitivity than TIMS, and is difficult to standardize for biological samples. Development of plasma-source mass spectrometry (MS) enabled the determination of B concentration and isotope ratio without requiring sample purification. Commonly used plasma-source MS uses an Ar inductively coupled plasma (ICP) as an ionization device interfaced to a low-resolution quadrupole mass analyzer. The quadrupole ICP-MS is less precise than TIMS and SIMS, but is a popular method for B isotope ratio determination because of its speed and convenience. B determination by ICP-MS suffers no spectroscopic interferences. However, sample matrices, memory effects, and some instrument parameters may affect the accuracy and precision of B isotope ratio determination if adequate precautions are not taken. New generations of plasma-source MS instruments using high-resolution mass analyzers provide better sensitivity and precision than the currently used quadrupole ICP-MS. Because of the convenience and high sample throughput, the high-resolution ICP-MS is expected to be the method of choice for B isotope ratio determination. The current state of instrumental capabilities is adequate for B isotope determination. However, precision and accuracy are primarily limited by sample preparation, introduction, and analytical methodology, including 1. Analyte loss and isotope fractionation during sample preparation. 2. The precision of B isotope determination in small samples, especially those containing low concentrations. 3. Difficult matrices. 4. Memory effects. Sample preparation by alkali fusion allows rapid and complete decomposition of hard-to-digest samples, but high-salt environments of the fused materials require extensive sample purification for B ratio determination. The alternative wet-ashing sample decomposition with HF also results in B loss and isotopic fractionation owing to the high volatility of BF3. Open-vessel dry- or wet-ashing methods usually do not work well for animal samples, and are also prone to B loss and contamination. Closed-vessel microwave digestion overcomes these problems, but the digests of biological materials have high C contents, which cause spectral interference on 11B and affect 11B/10B ratios. Exchange separation/preconcentration of B using exchange (cation or anion exchange, B-specific resin, e.g., Amberlite IRA-743) tend to cause B isotope fractionation, and C eluting from these resin columns may interfere with B isotope ratio determination. Memory effects of B that occur during sample determination may cause serious errors in B isotope ratio determination, especially when samples varying in B concentrations and/or isotope composition are analyzed together. Although the utilization of high-resolution plasma-source MS will undoubtedly improve analytical precision, it is the sample preparation, sample introduction, and analytical methodology that represent the primary limitation to accurate and precise B isotope ratio determination.