Related Experiment Videos
[Quality assessment of diabetes care in a large general practice. Identification and biomedical status]
J K Kristensen1, F Bro, T Lauritzen
1Aarhus Universitet, Forskningsenheden og Institut for Almen Medicin.
Abstract:
The aims of this study were to describe the diabetic population and to evaluate the routine diabetic care in one general practice. All patients with recognized diabetes were included. Information was collected from each patient's record and from patients' and doctors' questionnaire. One hundred an fourty (1.8%) of the patients had recognized diabetes and 81% of these diabetes had non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). According to the records, HbA1c had been monitored in 85% of the NIDDM patients in the preceding year and in 76% of the IDDM patients. The corresponding figures for albuminuria were 84% vs. 76%, for S-creatinine 74% vs. 81%, for S-cholesterol 37% vs. 24%, for weight 47% vs. 43%, for blood pressure 60% vs. 48%, for foot care 67% vs. 62% and for eye examination 76% vs. 75%. International targets for good control were obtained for HbA1c in 42% of cases, for weight in 23%, for blood pressure in 30% and for S-cholesterol in 40% at the last control. The results of the study indicate that there is a continuous demand for quality monitoring and improvement of diabetic care in general practice.