[Breast reconstruction: autologous tissue versus implant]

Modified radical mastectomy remains the standard for treatment of breast cancer. Women faced with the diagnosis of breast cancer often find it difficult to cope with the arousing emotions. Fear of death or cancer recurrence and a perceived loss of femininity often coexists with the desire for a return to normality and wholeness. For women seeking breast reconstruction various techniques have been developed. Two different ways for breast reconstruction have become a standard. One way is the reconstruction by tissue expansion or transposing locally available tissue with the use of implants. The other way is the reconstruction of the breast without using any implants with the Latissimus dorsi flap or the TRAM flap.

We performed 291 breast reconstructions. In 125 women available tissue and an implant was used. The Latissimus dorsi flap was used in 57 cases and 109 TRAM flaps either pedicled or as a microvascular flap were performed.

Using expanders we found a perforation of the device in 2 cases. After using implants there were capsular contracture in 2 cases and in 1 case we had an infection. Using autologous tissue we had 2 partial flap necrosis, 4 hematomas, and 4 prolonged healings. There was no complete flap necrosis.

Breast reconstruction using autologous tissue i.e. the TRAM flap is supposed to be a standard technique. Microsurgical transplantation of the TRAM flap shows almost no morbidity of the donor site area. Autologous tissue follows the changes of the body like weight gain or reduction to a certain extend and shows neither capsular contracture nor other implant associated side effects. Women get the impression that the TRAM flap is like soft tissue to the touch and not like a foreign body. The aesthetic results were in all cases superior sometimes needing minor secondary correction and mostly shaping of the nippel-areola complex. All patients were pleased with the result.