Related Experiment Videos
Immune response after laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication
1Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Turku, Finland.
The European Journal of Surgery = Acta Chirurgica
|March 9, 1999
Summary
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication showed less tissue damage compared to open surgery. However, both procedures resulted in similar changes in patients' immune responses over time.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and immunology research.
- Surgical outcomes and immune system interactions.
Background:
- Nissen fundoplication is a surgical procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
- Minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare immune response changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication.
- To evaluate tissue damage markers following different Nissen fundoplication approaches.
Main Methods:
- Prospective randomized clinical study involving 20 patients with symptomatic erosive esophagitis.
- Patients were randomized to either laparoscopic (n=10) or open (n=10) Nissen fundoplication.
- Immune markers including leukocyte counts, lymphocyte subpopulations, mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, albumin, cortisol, and phospholipase A2 activity were measured.
Main Results:
- Laparoscopic fundoplication was associated with reduced tissue damage markers (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) compared to the open approach.
- Significant changes in immune responses were observed over time in both groups.
- No significant differences in immune responses were detected between the laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication groups.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication appears to cause less tissue damage than the conventional open method.
- Despite reduced tissue damage, the surgical approach did not differentially impact the patients' immune responses.