Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Slippery slopes in flat countries--a response.

J J van Delden1

  • 1Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|March 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responsible data sharing in a big data-driven translational research platform: lessons learned.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2020
Same author

The principle of respect for autonomy in the care of nursing home residents.

Nursing ethics·2005
Same author

Guidelines for the use of do-not-resuscitate orders in Dutch hospitals.

Critical care medicine·2000
Same author

[Experiences of guardians of psychogeriatric patients regarding decision not to treat].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2000
Same author

Retrospective study of doctors' "end of life decisions" in caring for mentally handicapped people in institutions in The Netherlands.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1997
Same author

Changes in Dutch opinions on active euthanasia, 1966 through 1991.

JAMA·1995

This paper examines euthanasia and end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands. While some practices raise concerns, they may reflect a shift towards patient autonomy rather than a definitive slippery slope.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Sociology of Medicine

Background:

  • The paper responds to recent empirical data on euthanasia and end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands.
  • It critically evaluates the interpretation of this data concerning the 'slippery slope' argument.

Discussion:

  • Examines whether the use of euthanasia when palliative care is an option indicates a slippery slope or increased patient autonomy.
  • Addresses non-voluntary euthanasia, acknowledging it as a significant issue in the Netherlands but not conclusive proof of a slippery slope.
  • Discusses challenges in reporting euthanasia cases and recent changes to the Dutch notification procedure.

Key Insights:

  • The interpretation of euthanasia data is complex, with potential for multiple valid viewpoints.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Non-voluntary euthanasia presents ethical challenges but does not necessarily validate the slippery slope hypothesis.
  • Underreporting of euthanasia cases remains a concern despite procedural changes.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research is needed to clarify the trends in end-of-life decision-making.
    • Continued evaluation of reporting mechanisms is crucial for transparency in euthanasia practices.
    • Ongoing debate on patient autonomy versus potential risks in end-of-life care policies is anticipated.