Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

The Use of Fluorescent Target Arrays for Assessment of T Cell Responses In vivo
Published on: June 19, 2014
Differential cell tropism of feline immunodeficiency virus molecular clones in vivo
G A Dean1, S Himathongkham, E E Sparger
1Department of Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA.
Abstract:
Independent studies have demonstrated different cell tropisms for molecular clones of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV). In this report, we examined three clones, FIV-pF34, FIV-14, and FIV-pPPR, for replication in Crandell feline kidney (CrFK) cells, feline peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and feline macrophage cultures. Importantly, cell tropism for these three clones was also examined in vivo. FIV-pF34 replication was efficient in CrFK cells but severely restricted in PBMC, whereas replication of FIV-pPPR was vigorous in PBMC but severely restricted in CrFK cells. FIV-14 replication was productive in both CrFK cells and PBMC. Interestingly, all three molecular clones replicated with similar efficiencies in primary feline monocyte-derived macrophages. In vivo, FIV-pF34 proved least efficient for establishing persistent infection, and proviral DNA when detectable, was localized predominately to nonlymphoid cell populations (macrophages). FIV-pPPR proved most efficient for induction of a persistent viremia in vivo, and proviral DNA was localized predominately in CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets. FIV-14 inoculation of cats resulted in an infection characterized by seroconversion and localization of proviral DNA in CD4(+) lymphocytes only. Results of this study on diverse FIV molecular clones revealed that in vitro replication efficiency of an FIV isolate in PBMC directly correlated with replication efficiency in vivo, whereas proficiency for replication in macrophages in vitro was not predictive for replication potential in vivo. Also, infection of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets was associated with higher virus load in vivo. Results of the studies on these three FIV clones, which exhibited differential cell tropism, indicated a correlation between in vitro and in vivo cell tropism and virus replication.
Insights
This study investigated feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) replication in different cell types. In vitro replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) correlated with in vivo infection efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) exhibits varying cell tropisms among different molecular clones.
- Understanding FIV tropism is crucial for predicting disease progression and developing effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro and in vivo cell tropism and replication efficiency of three distinct FIV molecular clones (FIV-pF34, FIV-14, and FIV-pPPR).
- To determine the correlation between FIV replication in specific cell types in vitro and its behavior in vivo.
Main Methods:
- Replication of three FIV molecular clones was assessed in Crandell feline kidney (CrFK) cells, feline peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and primary feline monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro.
- The same FIV clones were evaluated for their replication efficiency and cell tropism in vivo following inoculation of cats.
Main Results:
- FIV-pF34 replicated efficiently in CrFK cells but poorly in PBMC; FIV-pPPR showed the opposite tropism. FIV-14 replicated in both cell types.
- All clones replicated similarly in macrophages in vitro. In vivo, FIV-pPPR was most efficient at inducing persistent viremia, primarily infecting CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes.
- FIV-pF34 was least efficient in vivo, with proviral DNA mainly in macrophages. FIV-14 infection localized to CD4(+) lymphocytes.
Conclusions:
- In vitro replication efficiency in PBMC directly correlates with in vivo FIV replication efficiency.
- In vitro macrophage replication does not predict in vivo replication potential.
- Infection of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets is associated with higher in vivo viral loads.

