Differential cell tropism of feline immunodeficiency virus molecular clones in vivo

G A Dean1, S Himathongkham, E E Sparger

  • 1Department of Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA.

Journal of Virology
|March 12, 1999
PubMed

Insights

This study investigated feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) replication in different cell types. In vitro replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) correlated with in vivo infection efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) exhibits varying cell tropisms among different molecular clones.
  • Understanding FIV tropism is crucial for predicting disease progression and developing effective interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the in vitro and in vivo cell tropism and replication efficiency of three distinct FIV molecular clones (FIV-pF34, FIV-14, and FIV-pPPR).
  • To determine the correlation between FIV replication in specific cell types in vitro and its behavior in vivo.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of three FIV molecular clones was assessed in Crandell feline kidney (CrFK) cells, feline peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and primary feline monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro.
  • The same FIV clones were evaluated for their replication efficiency and cell tropism in vivo following inoculation of cats.

Main Results:

  • FIV-pF34 replicated efficiently in CrFK cells but poorly in PBMC; FIV-pPPR showed the opposite tropism. FIV-14 replicated in both cell types.
  • All clones replicated similarly in macrophages in vitro. In vivo, FIV-pPPR was most efficient at inducing persistent viremia, primarily infecting CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes.
  • FIV-pF34 was least efficient in vivo, with proviral DNA mainly in macrophages. FIV-14 infection localized to CD4(+) lymphocytes.

Conclusions:

  • In vitro replication efficiency in PBMC directly correlates with in vivo FIV replication efficiency.
  • In vitro macrophage replication does not predict in vivo replication potential.
  • Infection of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets is associated with higher in vivo viral loads.

Related Concept Videos