Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cortical function: jump-starting the brain.

U O'Breathnach1, V Walsh

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.

Current Biology : CB
|March 13, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of insulation with bubble wrap and an absorbent pad on heat loss in anaesthetised cats.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2020
Same author

A survey of dog and cat anaesthesia in a sample of veterinary practices in New Zealand.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2017
Same author

Binding space and time through action.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2015
Same author

Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2015
Same author

Volunteer studies replacing animal experiments in brain research.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2014
Same author

A comparison of anaesthetic recoveries in cats following induction with either alfaxalone or ketamine and diazepam.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2013
Same journal

Hunting ecology predicts eye arrangements in the modular visual system of spiders.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Sub-second fluctuations between top-down and bottom-up modes distinguish diverse human brain states.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Queen bees offload pesticide burden to eggs when social buffering is overwhelmed.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Pitch selectivity in ferret auditory cortex.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

A cell size-dependent competition between geometry and polarity governs nuclear and spindle positioning in early embryos.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Trophic cascades drive sustainability in the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can disrupt or enhance cognitive functions. The specific effects of TMS depend on stimulation frequency and the targeted brain region, offering new insights into brain function modulation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuromodulation

Background:

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique.
  • Previous research primarily focused on the disruptive effects of TMS on cognitive functions.
  • Emerging evidence suggests TMS may also have facilitatory effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the dual effects (disruptive and enhancing) of TMS on human cognitive functions.
  • To explore the influence of stimulation parameters, specifically frequency, on TMS outcomes.
  • To determine the role of targeted brain areas in mediating TMS effects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in human participants.
  • Varied the frequency of magnetic stimulation applied to specific brain regions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed cognitive performance using standardized neuropsychological tests before and after stimulation.

    • Main Results:

    • TMS application resulted in both cognitive disruption and enhancement.
    • The direction of cognitive change was significantly correlated with the frequency of TMS.
    • Specific brain areas exhibited differential responses to varying TMS frequencies, influencing cognitive outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • TMS is a versatile tool capable of modulating cognitive functions in both inhibitory and excitatory ways.
    • Stimulation frequency and targeted brain region are critical determinants of TMS efficacy.
    • Findings advance our understanding of neuromodulation and its potential applications in cognitive neuroscience.