Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radon and lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

E S Ford1, A E Kelly, S M Teutsch

  • 1National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. esf2@cdc.gov

American Journal of Public Health
|March 17, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Targeted radon testing and mitigation strategies are more cost-effective for preventing lung cancer deaths than universal approaches. High-risk area screening offers significant savings per life-year saved.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visible light communication using InGaN optical sources with AlInGaP nanomembrane down-converters.

Optics express·2016
Same author

Lung function, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and mortality in US adults.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2014
Same author

Visible light communications using a directly modulated 422 nm GaN laser diode.

Optics letters·2013
Same author

Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Medellin and surrounding municipalities, Colombia, 2008-2010.

Preventive medicine·2012
Same author

A semiconductor laser with monolithically integrated dynamic polarization control.

Optics express·2012
Same author

Trends in obesity and abdominal obesity among adults in the United States from 1999-2008.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2010

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Public Health Policy
  • Cancer Prevention

Background:

  • Residential radon exposure is a significant risk factor for lung cancer in the United States.
  • Current recommendations for radon testing and mitigation vary, impacting public health outcomes and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of general (universal) versus targeted residential radon testing and mitigation strategies.
  • To identify optimal approaches for preventing radon-associated lung cancer deaths in the US.

Main Methods:

  • A decision-tree model was employed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis.
  • The model simulated scenarios for radon screening and mitigation to prevent lung cancer deaths.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Universal radon screening and mitigation at 4 pCi/L cost approximately $3 million per lung cancer death prevented.
  • Targeted strategies focusing on high-risk geographic areas reduced costs to about $2 million per death prevented.
  • Further cost reductions were observed with confirmatory testing, with targeted approaches showing greater cost-effectiveness per life-year saved.

Conclusions:

  • Targeted radon testing and mitigation strategies present a more cost-effective alternative to current universal recommendations.
  • These findings suggest a need to reconsider national radon policy for improved public health impact and resource management.