Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Murine Ileocolic Bowel Resection with Primary Anastomosis
Published on: October 29, 2014
Should colon-penetrating small missiles be removed? An experimental study of retrocolic wound tracks
D P Edwards1, D Brown, P E Watkins
1Medical Countermeasures (Trauma and Surgery), Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Small-fragment injury to the colon may occur in approximately 5% of battlefield casualties. The surgical management aims to reduce the risk of retrocolic infection and provide optimal conditions for colonic wound healing. This study aimed to quantify the risk of retrocolic infection. Steel fragments were fired through exteriorized porcine colon and caught in 20% gelatin. The fragments, and resultant tracks, were extracted and subjected to quantitative bacteriological examination to determine the extent of contamination. The median bacterial count for complete tracks was 1.2 x 10(4) CFU/g (interquartile range 1.8 x 10(3) to 2.7 x 10(4)). Counts were highest in the initial 1 cm of the track and reduced along its length. This study does not support wound track excision or missile fragment removal in cases of retrocolic trauma following penetrating colonic injury. Either or both procedures will increase local trauma and are likely to prejudice colonic wound repair.
Insights
Retrocolic trauma from small fragments contaminates colon tracks with bacteria. Bacterial counts decrease along the track, suggesting wound track excision is not beneficial for penetrating colonic injuries.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal Surgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Bacteriology
Background:
- Penetrating colonic injuries are a concern in battlefield casualties.
- Surgical management of colonic trauma focuses on preventing retrocolic infection and promoting wound healing.
- The risk of retrocolic infection following such injuries requires quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the risk of retrocolic infection associated with small-fragment colonic injuries.
- To evaluate the bacteriological contamination extent within colonic wound tracks.
- To inform surgical decision-making regarding wound track management.
Main Methods:
- Simulated penetrating colonic injury using steel fragments fired through exteriorized porcine colon.
- Collection of fragments and wound tracks in 20% gelatin.
- Quantitative bacteriological examination of fragments and tracks to determine bacterial load (CFU/g).
Main Results:
- Median bacterial count for complete tracks was 1.2 x 10(4) CFU/g.
- Bacterial contamination was highest within the initial 1 cm of the wound track.
- Bacterial counts decreased progressively along the length of the track.
Conclusions:
- The study does not support wound track excision for retrocolic trauma from penetrating colonic injury.
- Missile fragment removal is not recommended due to increased local trauma and potential prejudice to colonic wound repair.
- Current findings suggest conservative management may be optimal for such injuries.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...

