Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tomorrow's doctors: today's mistakes?

W S Monkhouse1, T B Farrell

  • 1Department of Anatomy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin. wsmonkho@rcsi.ie

Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
|March 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Head dissection prepared along similar lines to that described by Logan et al.(2000).

Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Dissection: a positive experience.

Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Helical CT evaluation of the perirenal space and its boundaries: a cadaveric study.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Anatomical spaces: a review.

Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)·2000
Same author

Anatomy of the peritoneal aspect of the deep inguinal ring: implications for laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)·1997
Same author

Innervation of the rat external auditory meatus: a retrograde tracing study.

Somatosensory & motor research·1994

This critique of "Tomorrow's Doctors" questions its proposed medical education reforms, highlighting concerns about curriculum changes and teaching methods for future physicians.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Curriculum Development
  • Anatomy Education

Background:

  • The General Medical Council's "Tomorrow's Doctors" (1993) significantly influenced UK medical education.
  • The document proposed substantial reforms to how future doctors are trained.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the proposed changes in "Tomorrow's Doctors."
  • To identify inconsistencies and undesirable aspects of the recommended medical education reforms.
  • To assess the impact of these changes on anatomy education.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the "Tomorrow's Doctors" document.
  • Examination of proposed pedagogical approaches, including curiosity-based learning and systems-based teaching.
  • Evaluation of the document's stance on scientific method, ethics, and departmental structures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The document's emphasis on change is questioned given the static nature of human anatomy and physiology.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of curiosity-driven learning for core medical material.
  • The suitability of the university model and the inclusion of ethics and scientific method in undergraduate medical education are doubted.
  • Criticism is directed at the document's condemnation of traditional departmental structures and its uncritical support for integration.
  • The impact of these reforms on anatomy teaching is considered.

Conclusions:

  • The reforms proposed in "Tomorrow's Doctors" may lead to inefficiencies and questionable pedagogical choices in medical education.
  • The document's critiques of traditional structures and its espousal of new methods lack sufficient evidence.
  • Further scrutiny is needed regarding the appropriateness of certain subjects and teaching models within undergraduate medical curricula.