Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
New primary prevention trials of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: SCD-HEFT and
1Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany.
Insights
Preventing sudden arrhythmic death in heart failure patients is key. Two trials, SCD-Heft and MADIT II, investigate if implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or amiodarone reduce total mortality in high-risk individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Primary prevention of sudden arrhythmic death in patients with organic heart disease, poor left ventricular function, and heart failure remains a significant clinical challenge.
- Amiodarone and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are primary therapeutic options for preventing sudden arrhythmic death in these high-risk patients.
- Optimal heart failure and anti-ischemic treatments are crucial but may not eliminate the risk of sudden death in all patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prophylactic benefit of ICDs versus amiodarone on total mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
- To compare the effectiveness of ICDs versus no ICD therapy in reducing total mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients with low ejection fraction.
- To assess secondary endpoints including arrhythmic vs. non-arrhythmic mortality, morbidity, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-Heft) randomizes patients with heart failure (NYHA class II/III, LVEF < 35%) to amiodarone or ICD.
- The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II randomizes coronary artery disease patients (LVEF < 30%, post-MI) to ICD or no ICD.
- Both trials utilize total mortality as the primary endpoint and include assessments of quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- The abstract does not contain specific results, but outlines the design and objectives of two major clinical trials.
- These trials aim to define the role of ICDs and amiodarone in reducing mortality in specific high-risk heart failure populations.
- Results from these studies are anticipated to guide clinical practice in the primary prevention of sudden arrhythmic death.
Conclusions:
- The findings from SCD-Heft and MADIT II are expected to provide critical evidence for optimizing sudden arrhythmic death prevention strategies.
- These trials will help determine the most effective therapeutic approach (ICD vs. amiodarone vs. optimal medical therapy) for high-risk heart failure patients.
- The studies aim to improve survival rates and quality of life for patients susceptible to sudden cardiac death.
Abstract:
Primary prevention of sudden arrhythmic death in patients with organic heart disease with poor left ventricular function and/or heart failure is currently a major challenge in cardiology. Amiodarone (with or without beta blockers) and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are considered the 2 major therapeutic tools to prevent sudden arrhythmic death in these patients. Two large trials have been launched to define the prophylactic benefit of the ICD or amiodarone on total mortality in patients that receive optimal heart failure and anti-ischemic treatment but remain at high risk of dying suddenly. The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-Heft) is designed to determine whether amiodarone or the ICD will decrease overall mortality in patients with coronary artery disease or nonischemic cardiomyopathy who are in heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III and have a left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%. The primary endpoint is total mortality; secondary objectives are comparison of arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic mortality and morbidity in the 3 arms as well as quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and incidence of episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II is a follow-up study to the MADIT trial. It examines the prophylactic benefit in coronary artery disease patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 30%, who have had at least 1 myocardial infarction but require no further risk stratification. MADIT II is a sequential design trial that compares ICD versus no ICD therapy. Programmed electrical stimulation to test inducibility of ventricular tachycardia is performed during ICD implantation, and various noninvasive risk markers are tested after randomization. Primary endpoint is total mortality, and secondary objectives are quality-of-life issues as well as cost-effectiveness ratio.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

