Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?

D Griffin1, R Buehler

  • 1University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK. daleg@cogs.susx.ac.uk

Cognitive Psychology
|March 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive biases in probabilistic judgment persist even when using frequentistic predictions for sets of events. Both frequentistic and case-specific probability judgments show similar levels of inaccuracy and overconfidence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying the computational capability of a nanomagnetic reservoir computing platform with emergent magnetisation dynamics.

Nanotechnology·2022
Same author

Outcomes of Patients with a pH<7.0 Presenting to the Emergency Department (OPpHED Study).

Irish medical journal·2022
Same author

Investigating the Nature of Late-Time High-Energy GRB Emission Through Joint <i>Fermi /Swift</i> Observations.

The Astrophysical journal·2022
Same author

<i>Fermi</i> LARGE AREA TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF BLAZAR 3C 279 OCCULTATIONS BY THE SUN.

The Astrophysical journal·2021
Same author

Highly realistic cadaveric trauma simulation of the multiply injured battlefield casualty: an international, multidisciplinary exercise in far-forward surgical management.

Injury·2020
Same author

Measurement of the high-energy gamma-ray emission from the Moon with the Fermi Large Area Telescope.

Physical review. D. (2016)·2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Errors in probabilistic judgment are often linked to difficulties with statistical thinking for single cases.
  • Theoretical analyses suggest frequentistic predictions for sets of cases might mitigate these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether frequentistic predictions reduce cognitive biases compared to case-specific probability judgments.
  • To assess the statistical sophistication and accuracy of frequentistic versus case-specific predictions across different cognitive biases.

Main Methods:

  • Compared aggregate frequency and case-specific probability judgments for student projects, general knowledge, and categorical predictions.
  • Utilized within-subject and between-subject designs to evaluate prediction accuracy and bias.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined three established cognitive biases: planning fallacy, overconfidence, and base rate neglect.

    • Main Results:

    • Frequency-based predictions were not more accurate or statistically sophisticated than case-specific probability judgments.
    • In between-subject comparisons, aggregate and single-case predictions showed similar optimism and low predictive validity.
    • Within-subject comparisons revealed aggregate judgments were more conservative but still optimistically biased.

    Conclusions:

    • Frequentistic predictions for sets of events do not inherently improve statistical reasoning or accuracy over case-specific subjective probability judgments.
    • The cognitive biases associated with probabilistic judgment appear robust across both prediction formats.
    • Rethinking the efficacy of frequentistic approaches for mitigating judgment errors is warranted.