Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standard versus modified bio-electrical impedance analysis on reactance measurements.

A A Turner1, M Bouffard, H C Lukaski

  • 1Arctic Human Performance Laboratory, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA.

International Journal of Circumpolar Health
|March 27, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Objective measurement of respiratory loudness in dogs with brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome before and after corrective surgery.

Australian veterinary journal·2025
Same author

Relationship between body composition and the components of somatotype.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017
Same author

Taxonomy of the <i>Capensibufo</i> <i>rosei</i> group (Anura: Bufonidae) from South Africa.

Zootaxa·2017
Same author

Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2013
Same author

Evaluation of the Megaduct sweat collector for mineral analysis.

Physiological measurement·2012
Same author

Update on the relationship between magnesium and exercise.

Magnesium research·2006

The standard electrode placement for bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) yields more consistent body composition measurements than modified procedures. This finding is crucial for accurate reactance score reliability in research and clinical settings.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Anthropometry

Background:

  • Bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a common method for assessing total body composition.
  • Accurate reactance measurements in BIA depend on consistent electrode placement.
  • Previous studies have not definitively compared standard versus modified electrode placement for reactance consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the score consistency of observed reactance measurements for total body composition BIA.
  • To evaluate two electrode placement procedures: standard and modified proximal sites.
  • To determine which procedure yields more reliable reactance scores.

Main Methods:

  • Eighty military males (19-56 years) participated in the study.
  • A four-faceted crossed, random effects design was employed using the RJL Systems Spectrum Lightweight Instrument.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed using generalizability (G) and decision (D) studies to assess score consistency under standard and modified electrode placements.

    • Main Results:

    • Person contributed the largest source of systematic variance, as anticipated.
    • The person x day interaction represented a significant source of measurement error for both procedures.
    • Generalizability coefficients (G-coefficients) for reactance measurements were higher for the standard electrode placement (0.86) compared to the modified procedure (0.83).

    Conclusions:

    • The standard electrode placement procedure demonstrated superior score consistency for reactance measurements in BIA.
    • Generalizability analysis confirmed the reliability advantage of the standard method over the modified proximal electrode placement.
    • These findings support the continued use of standard electrode placement for accurate body composition assessment via BIA.