Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Overview of the Skull

Overview of the Skull

The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...

Muscles for Facial Expressions

Muscles for Facial Expressions

The craniofacial muscles are a collection of approximately 20 thin skeletal muscles situated beneath the skin of the face and scalp. These muscles, primarily responsible for the vast array of human facial expressions, originate from the bones or fibrous structures of the skull and extend outwards to connect with the skin. While most skeletal muscles in the body are enveloped in thick fascia, facial muscles generally have a more delicate fascial covering, with the buccinator muscle being a...

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Ocular blood flow measurements and their importance in glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration.

The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ·2001

Same author

Identification of MUC1 proteolytic cleavage sites in vivo.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2001

Same author

Intractable insomnia after cessation of treatment with thalidomide.

Gastroenterology·2001

Same author

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2001

Same author

[Beyond "successful aging: Rembrandt in his self-portraits].

Psychiatrische Praxis·2001

Same author

Sonographic diagnosis of a pneumothorax inapparent on plain radiography: confirmation by computed tomography.

The Journal of trauma·2001

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals.

N Kanwisher¹, D Stanley, A Harris

¹Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.

|March 27, 1999

Summary

The human fusiform face area (FFA) is highly selective for faces. While it responds to other human and animal stimuli, its primary function is facial recognition, not general animate object processing.

More Related Videos

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroimaging

Background:

The fusiform face area (FFA) is a region in the human brain.
Its role in processing visual stimuli, particularly faces, is well-established.
However, the precise extent of its selectivity for faces versus other animate or inanimate objects remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the selectivity of the human fusiform face area (FFA).
To determine if the FFA responds to a broader range of stimuli beyond just faces, including human and animal forms.

Main Methods:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity.
The study presented participants with six categories of visual stimuli.
Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes in the FFA were recorded in response to each stimulus type.

Main Results:

The FFA showed the strongest signal increases in response to human faces (2.0%) and human heads (1.7%).
Significant responses were also observed for whole humans (1.5%), animal heads (1.3%), whole animals (1.0%), and human bodies without heads (1.0%).
Responses to animal bodies without heads (0.8%) and inanimate objects (0.7%) were notably weaker, with the former not significantly different from inanimate objects.

Conclusions:

The findings indicate that the human fusiform face area (FFA) is primarily selective for faces.
While the FFA shows some response to other human and animate stimuli, this response is significantly less pronounced than for faces.
The FFA's specialization is for facial stimuli, not for general processing of animate objects.