Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device (ALDM) Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Theory of mind in nonhuman primates
1Department of Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom. c.heyes@ucl.ac.uk
Chimpanzees may not possess a "theory of mind." Existing evidence for ape mental states is weak, potentially explained by non-mentalistic processes. New experiments are needed to differentiate true understanding from associative learning.
Area of Science:
- Comparative Psychology
- Cognitive Ethology
- Primate Cognition
Background:
- The concept of "theory of mind" in chimpanzees has been debated since Premack and Woodruff's 1978 article.
- Claims of ape mental state concepts (e.g., "want," "know") lack substantial progress compared to human research.
- Existing evidence for theory of mind in nonhuman primates is re-evaluated, suggesting alternative non-mentalistic explanations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically assess the evidence for theory of mind in nonhuman primates.
- To highlight the limitations of current research and arguments supporting theory of mind in apes.
- To propose a novel experimental procedure to rigorously test for mental state concepts in chimpanzees.
Main Methods:
- Survey and critical analysis of empirical studies on imitation, self-recognition, social relationships, deception, role-taking, and perspective-taking in primates.
- Evaluation of arguments based on parsimony and convergent evidence.
- Proposal of a new experimental design using conditional discrimination training and transfer tests.
Main Results:
- Empirical evidence interpreted as theory of mind in nonhuman primates can be explained by chance or non-mentalistic processes like associative learning.
- Arguments for theory of mind based on parsimony or convergent evidence are found to be uncompelling.
- Current experimental procedures are insufficient to distinguish theory of mind from non-mentalistic alternatives.
Conclusions:
- Substantial progress in understanding primate cognition requires moving beyond current interpretations of behavior.
- Experimental paradigms must be developed to differentiate mentalistic from non-mentalistic explanations.
- A proposed conditional discrimination procedure offers a potential method to test for the concept of "see" in chimpanzees, advancing research in primate theory of mind.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
08:06Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Concepts and Prototypes
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
The Nativist Approach