Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

J C Mosher1, R M Leahy, P S Lewis

  • 1Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545, USA.

IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|March 31, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuroanatomic Markers of Posttraumatic Epilepsy Based on MR Imaging and Machine Learning.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

First Report of Aristastoma Leaf Spot on Desert Rose.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Dieback Caused by Verticillium dahliae on Blighia sapida in the United States.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Gladiolus Rust Caused by Uromyces transversalis Makes First Nearctic Appearance in Florida.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Tomato spotted wilt virus Found in Five Species of the genus Tragopogon in a Florida Greenhouse.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Automated MRI Volumetric Analysis in Patients with Rasmussen Syndrome.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016

Solving the forward problem is crucial for analyzing neural activity from electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. This study unifies EEG and MEG forward problem solutions, simplifying calculations and improving boundary element methods.

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Accurate computation of spatio-temporal neural activity from electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data relies on solving the forward problem.
  • The forward problem quantifies scalp potentials or magnetic fields generated by neural sources.
  • Existing methods for solving the forward problem can be complex and computationally intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unified framework for analytical and numerical solutions to the EEG and MEG forward problems.
  • To simplify the calculation of EEG forward problems, challenging the notion that they are inherently more complex than MEG.
  • To investigate and improve boundary element methods (BEMs) for forward problem computation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Factorization of the lead field into source moment, a head/source/sensor geometry-dependent kernel matrix, and a sensor matrix.
  • Development of novel reformulations for EEG and MEG kernels, incorporating Berg parameters for EEG approximations.
  • Investigation of various boundary element methods (BEMs) with alternative error-weighting strategies.

Main Results:

  • A unified formulation for EEG and MEG forward problem kernels applicable to inverse methods.
  • Demonstration that EEG forward problem calculations can be as straightforward as MEG.
  • Evidence suggesting improved accuracy and efficiency in BEMs using alternative error-weighting methods.

Conclusions:

  • The unified treatment simplifies the computation of neural source activity from EEG and MEG.
  • The proposed methods offer more accessible and potentially more accurate solutions for neuroimaging inverse problems.
  • Further advancements in BEMs are achievable through optimized error-weighting techniques.