Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Changes in Mammary Gland Morphology and Breast Cancer Risk in Rats
Published on: October 16, 2010
Understanding meta-analysis in cancer epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer
1Biostatistics Unit, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Abstract:
Meta-analyses of the relationship between dietary fat and breast cancer risk using different methodologies have reported conflicting results. This investigation compares methodologic aspects of meta-analyses of patient data (MAP) with meta-analyses of data from the literature (MAL), and computes relative risk (RR) estimates from a random effects model using 28 published studies of dietary fat and breast cancer. MAP and MAL results compare closely when homogeneity is verified. When statistical homogeneity is rejected, a random effects model adjusting for study design and location is appropriate. The highest RR was found for case-control studies of European women (RR: 1.46), followed by North American case-control studies (RR: 1.25), case-control studies of women on other continents (RR: 1.23), cohort studies in Europe (RR: 1.20), and cohort studies in North America (RR: 1.02). The overall risk estimate in a MAL with heterogeneous studies should be interpreted only in a conditional model.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Causality in Epidemiology
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

