Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tallying the tab.

J Kosterlitz

    National Journal
    |February 17, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Rockefeller panel on health care released a report that will prompt public discussion on funding its proposals. This forces a national conversation about healthcare payment strategies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Income security. Do it yourself.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Stern measures.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Rise of the medical savings account.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Unmanaged care?

    National journal·1994
    Same author

    Doctors' lobby tries to heal itself.

    National journal·1994
    Same author

    Signs of life in the wreckage.

    National journal·1994

    Area of Science:

    • Health Policy
    • Healthcare Economics

    Background:

    • The Rockefeller panel on health care has issued a significant report outlining proposals.
    • The report deliberately omits specific recommendations for financing these healthcare proposals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the implications of the Rockefeller panel's report on public discourse regarding healthcare funding.
    • To highlight the necessity of addressing the financial aspects of proposed healthcare reforms.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of the Rockefeller panel's report content and stated omissions.
    • Assessment of the anticipated public and political reaction to the report's focus on proposals without funding mechanisms.

    Main Results:

    • The report, despite lacking funding details, is poised to initiate widespread public debate on healthcare payment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The absence of financial recommendations serves as a catalyst for addressing the core question of how to pay for proposed healthcare changes.

    • Conclusions:

    • The Rockefeller panel's report, by focusing on proposals without specifying payment methods, effectively compels a national dialogue on healthcare financing.
    • Future discussions must grapple with the economic realities and funding strategies required to implement the panel's healthcare recommendations.