Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Solomon--the ultimate moral expert?

V L Warren1

  • 1Chapman College, Orange, CA 92666.

HEC Forum : an Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues
|December 10, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feminist directions in medical ethics.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·1991
Same author

The 'medicine is war' metaphor.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·1990
Same author

A metabolite of polybrominated biphenyls: its identification and decomposition to a brominated dibenzofuran in the gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·1979
Same author

An interview with Georgia McMurray, New York City's Commissioner for Child Development.

Children today·1972
Same author

Night care center.

Children today·1972

Relying on moral experts, like the imagined SOLOMON computer program or the wise Solomé, does not solve difficult moral decisions. The personal process of moral deliberation is crucial for growth and self-understanding.

Area of Science:

  • Moral Philosophy
  • Ethics
  • Artificial Intelligence Ethics

Background:

  • Individuals often seek external moral guidance for complex ethical dilemmas.
  • The concept of a perfect moral expert is explored as a potential solution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of relying on a moral expert, whether artificial or human.
  • To emphasize the intrinsic value of the moral decision-making process itself.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of moral responsibility and expertise.
  • Thought experiments involving an artificial moral expert (SOLOMON) and a human moral guide (Solomé).

Main Results:

  • Individualizing an artificial moral expert like SOLOMON presents challenges comparable to making moral decisions directly.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Delegating moral decision-making to any expert, including a wise human guide, ultimately proves insufficient.

    • Conclusions:

    • The process of moral deliberation is inherently valuable and essential for personal development.
    • Over-reliance on moral experts can hinder individual moral growth and self-discovery.