Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proposed HCFA lab rules: the changing face for LIS.

D Winsten

    Computers in Healthcare
    |August 7, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    New laboratory regulations may increase costs and limit technology adoption, despite some reasonable provisions. Well-managed computerized labs may already meet many requirements, with ASTM standards offering guidance.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Making it work: planning and executing a successful LIS installation.

    Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2001
    Same author

    Integrating your radiology information system in a complex computing environment.

    Radiology management·2001
    Same author

    Integrated reporting and interpretation of clinical results.

    Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2001
    Same author

    Optimizing clinical information systems in complex computing environments. Panel discussion.

    Healthcare information management : journal of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society of the American Hospital Association·1996
    Same author

    The state of the lab.

    Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems·1996
    Same author

    The clinical data repository: provider survey '96.

    Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems·1996
    Same journal

    CHIM (Center for Healthcare Information Management) survey shows confidence in EDI, CPR technologies.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Product overview hotlist. Integration tools.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Trend or fad? Acquisitions rock healthcare I/S industry.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Memorial Sloan-Kettering cures paperwork problems with document imaging.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Ten questions worth asking about mobile computing.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    CIH survey confirms communications networks as vital healthcare technologies.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Laboratory Science
    • Health Informatics

    Background:

    • The proposed Subpart P regulations aim to standardize laboratory practices.
    • Current state-of-the-art laboratory information systems (LIS) possess advanced capabilities.
    • Existing well-managed computerized laboratories often align with many proposed regulatory standards.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of proposed Subpart P regulations on laboratory information systems.
    • To assess the cost implications and technological feasibility of the regulations.
    • To identify areas where regulations align with current best practices in computerized laboratories.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of proposed Subpart P regulations.
    • Assessment of current LIS capabilities and functionalities.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of regulatory requirements with existing laboratory system practices.

    • Main Results:

    • The regulations, while well-intentioned, may not fully accommodate advanced LIS capabilities.
    • Implementation could lead to increased operational costs for laboratories.
    • Some regulations reflect current practices in well-managed computerized laboratories.

    Conclusions:

    • Subpart P regulations may inadvertently hinder technology adoption due to cost and system compatibility issues.
    • Laboratories should consider existing standards, such as those from the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), for guidance.
    • A balanced approach is needed to ensure regulations support, rather than impede, laboratory modernization.