Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does privatization serve the public interest?

J B Goodman1, G W Lovemen

  • 1Harvard Business School.

Harvard Business Review
|October 6, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Direct gold inlays.

The Dental gazette·2014
Same author

Reward shifts and motor responses following microinjections of opiate-specific agonists into either the core or shell of the nucleus accumbens.

Psychopharmacology·1995
Same author

Laughing matters: taking your job seriously and yourself lightly.

JAMA·1992
Same author

Providers can lead the future well beyond traditional care.

Provider (Washington, D.C.)·1989
Same author

Stresses created by occlusal prematurities in a new photoelastic model system.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1976
Same author

A complete technic for direct gold inlays.

Dental survey·1948
Same journal

The Case for Capitation.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

How to Pay for Health Care.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

How to Preempt Team Conflict.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

The Secrets of Great Teamwork.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

Leading the Team You Inherit.

Harvard business review·2016
Same journal

Wicked Problem Solvers.

Harvard business review·2016
See all related articles

Privatization

Area of Science:

  • Public Administration
  • Economics
  • Organizational Theory

Background:

  • Privatization is debated for its potential to enhance efficiency and quality.
  • Critics argue privatization may neglect broader public interest concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze whether privatization effectively serves the public interest.
  • To evaluate the impact of ownership forms on public services.

Main Methods:

  • The study examines the privatization debate, drawing parallels with corporate takeover discussions.
  • It focuses on the principles of managerial accountability.

Main Results:

  • The form of ownership is less critical than ensuring strong managerial accountability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Effective oversight mechanisms are key, regardless of ownership structure.

    • Conclusions:

    • Managerial accountability, not privatization itself, is paramount for serving the public interest.
    • Policies should prioritize establishing robust accountability frameworks.