Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026
05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Autonomy's responsibility. A gloss on the Wanglie affair
1Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Health Progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)
|November 5, 1991
Summary
The Helga Wanglie case highlights the complex balance between patient rights, physician responsibilities, and family involvement in medical decision-making, particularly concerning life-sustaining treatment.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Bioethics
- Healthcare Law
Background:
- A patient's cardiac arrest led to a prolonged unconscious state.
- Disagreements arose between medical staff and the patient's family regarding life-sustaining treatment.
- The case involves a chronic care facility and subsequent hospital transfer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the ethical and legal dimensions of the doctor-patient-family relationship.
- To analyze the principles of patient rights, physician responsibilities, and informed consent.
- To explore the complexities of decision-making for patients unable to participate directly.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis of the Helga Wanglie incident.
- Review of legal and ethical frameworks governing medical treatment.
- Examination of the concepts of patient autonomy and best interests.
Main Results:
- The attending physician deemed respirator use medically inappropriate for the patient's personal interests.
- The family insisted on continued treatment despite the physician's recommendation.
- The patient remained on life support for 13 months until death.
Conclusions:
- The case underscores the tension between a family's desire for care and a physician's medical judgment.
- It emphasizes that while patients have rights to information and treatment choices, they cannot demand any specific therapy.
- The dispute highlights the need for clear guidelines in navigating end-of-life care decisions involving surrogate decision-makers.
Related Concept Videos
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
00:56Attribution Theory
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
04:49Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
00:57Deindividuation
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
01:25Self-Regulation
Self-regulation, also known as self-control, encompasses a range of cognitive and behavioral processes that allow individuals to adjust their internal states and outward actions to align with socially acceptable norms and long-term goals. It plays a fundamental role in adaptive functioning, from resisting impulsive behaviors to persisting through challenging tasks. While its benefits are widely recognized, self-regulation is not limitless. Muraven and Baumeister's theory posits that...