Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Too many cooks batter technology assessment.

M Wagner

    Modern Healthcare
    |December 2, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Technology assessment involves over 70 groups with varying methods, leading to conflicting and incomparable findings. This highlights significant challenges in evaluating new health technologies effectively.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT): mutational studies of familial EXT1 cases and EXT-associated malignancies.

    American journal of human genetics·1997
    Same author

    Expression of a truncated EGF receptor is associated with inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell growth and enhanced sensitivity to cisplatinum.

    International journal of cancer·1996
    Same author

    Periodic limb movements as the initial manifestation of restless legs syndrome triggered by lumbosacral radiculopathy.

    Sleep·1996
    Same author

    IVF: out-of-date evidence, or not.

    Lancet (London, England)·1996
    Same author

    Congenital muscular dystrophy with laminin alpha 2 chain deficiency: identification of a new intermediate phenotype and correlation of clinical findings to muscle immunohistochemistry.

    European journal of pediatrics·1996
    Same author

    [Early manifestation of polycystic kidney changes in tuberous sclerosis].

    Der Pathologe·1996
    Same journal

    Most frequently billed DRGs: Ranked by 2014 Medicare patient discharges.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    Same journal

    Demand for nurses by state through 2025: Ranked by projected demand in 2025.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    Same journal

    Largest healthcare real estate investment trusts: Publicly traded healthcare REITs ranked by market capitalization, as of May 31.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    Same journal

    Top 10 patient advocacy/research organizations: Ranked by 2014 revenue, based on Modern Healthcare's review of IRS Form 990s.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    Same journal

    Largest associations of healthcare professionals Ranked by 2014 revenue, based on Modern Healthcare's review of IRS Form 990s.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    Same journal

    Health IT priorities.

    Modern healthcare·2019
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Technology Assessment
    • Medical Innovation Evaluation

    Background:

    • Numerous organizations (over 70) are engaged in technology assessment.
    • These groups exhibit diverse agendas and methodologies.
    • The field of technology assessment is experiencing significant activity and interest.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and describe growing problems within the field of technology assessment.
    • To highlight the challenges arising from the proliferation of assessment groups.
    • To underscore the lack of comparability and consistency in technology assessment outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of the landscape of technology assessment groups.
    • Examination of the variations in information sought by different groups.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of the methodologies employed in technology assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Discrepancies exist in the data collected by various technology assessment bodies.
    • Methodological differences among groups result in non-comparable assessment findings.
    • Conflicting results are produced due to variations in assessment approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • The current state of technology assessment is fragmented.
    • Inconsistent approaches hinder effective evaluation of new medical devices, drugs, and procedures.
    • Standardization of methods and information requirements is needed for reliable technology assessment.