Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

All-payer ratesetting: down but not out.

G F Anderson1

  • 1Johns Hopkins Center for Hospital Finance and Management, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Health Care Financing Review. Annual Supplement
|December 10, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medicare's Prospective Payment System: Paying for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·2009
Same author

A comparison of single- and multi-payer health insurance systems and options for reform.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2003
Same author

Comparison of risk adjusters for medicaid-enrolled children with and without chronic health conditions.

Ambulatory pediatrics : the official journal of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association·2002
Same author

Medicare reform.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Women and chronic conditions: a double-edged sword. Interview by Susan Calvert Finn.

Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine·2001
Same author

Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery.

Anesthesiology·2001

All-payer hospital ratesetting effectively achieves cost containment and improves access for the uninsured. This system does not hinder healthcare competition or technological advancement, with minimal impact on care quality.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The U.S. healthcare system shifted from regulation to competition, leading to the decline of all-payer hospital ratesetting.
  • Previous literature on all-payer ratesetting needs updating with current data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of all-payer hospital ratesetting in meeting its objectives.
  • To assess the impact of all-payer ratesetting on healthcare competition, technology, and quality of care.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of published literature.
  • Supplementation of existing literature with current data.

Main Results:

  • All-payer ratesetting successfully achieves cost containment and reduces cost shifting.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It improves access to care for the uninsured and enhances hospital productivity.
  • No significant negative impact was observed on competitive healthcare systems, technology diffusion, length of stay, admissions, or quality of care.

    • Conclusions:

    • All-payer hospital ratesetting is a viable policy for achieving multiple healthcare objectives.
    • The system demonstrates effectiveness without stifling innovation or negatively impacting key healthcare metrics.