Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The Critikon ProtectIV catheter issue.

P Lurie¹, J Jagger

¹San Francisco Interns and Residents Association.

Healthcare Hazardous Materials Management : HHMM

|February 8, 1992

Summary

Healthcare workers advocate for universal use of safety-engineered devices, like the ProtectIV catheter, to prevent needlestick injuries and bloodborne pathogen exposure. This approach prioritizes engineering controls for enhanced patient and provider safety.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The role of epidemiology in informing United States childhood immunization policy and practice.

Annals of epidemiology·2020

Same author

Upturned, broken heart.

Internal medicine journal·2010

Same author

Needlestick-prevention devices: we should already be there.

The Journal of hospital infection·2008

Same author

Ultrasound assessment of spleen size in collegiate athletes.

British journal of sports medicine·2006

Same author

Purtscher-like retinopathy as an initial presentation of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report.

Eye (London, England)·2004

Same author

Deep venous thrombosis following uneventful phacoemulsification.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2003

Area of Science:

Healthcare infection control
Occupational safety and health
Medical device technology

Background:

Union grievance at San Francisco General Hospital concerning the Critikon ProtectIV catheter.
Debate over mandatory vs. risk-based use of safety-engineered devices for needlestick prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the ProtectIV catheter in reducing needlestick injuries.
To advocate for the fundamental role of engineering controls, specifically safety needles, in exposure control plans for bloodborne pathogens.

Main Methods:

Review of union position advocating for universal use of safety catheters.
Inclusion of statements from Dr. Peter Lurie and Dr. Janine Jagger presenting data on the ProtectIV catheter's effectiveness.
Guidance on evaluating safety needle devices.

Main Results:

The ProtectIV catheter is designed to prevent needlesticks during insertion and removal.
Initial data suggests the ProtectIV catheter is effective in reducing injuries.
The logic supporting safety devices as the best approach to reduce needlesticks is presented.

Conclusions:

Safety-engineered devices should be a fundamental component of exposure control plans.
Universal implementation of safety devices like the ProtectIV catheter is recommended to minimize occupational risks.
The documents provide information and guidance for evaluating safety needle devices.

Related Experiment Videos