Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Setting priorities in prevention.

K Schaapveld1, H P van de Water, E W Bergsma

  • 1Netherlands Institute for Preventive Health Care, Leiden.

Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|December 10, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The choice of profession of medical doctors graduating from Leiden University].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004
Same author

Short report: functional mobility assessment at home. Timed up and go test using three different chairs.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2001
Same author

Screening for hearing and visual loss among elderly with questionnaires and tests: which method is the most convincing for action?

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2001
Same author

Effects of screening for disorders among the elderly: an intervention study in general practice.

Family practice·2000
Same author

[Milestones in prevention in the past century].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·1999
Same author

New global Health for All targets.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
Same journal

Basic human values, responsiveness, and dignity in geriatric organizations in Israel: A qualitative study of state regulations.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

A policy analysis of the three-month waiting period for new and returning residents to access provincial health insurance in Ontario, Canada.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Policy priorities in palliative and end-of-life care: An exploration of issues reflected in public strategy.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Advancing stakeholder analysis: Power and participation in health technology assessment policy development in the United Arab Emirates.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Cultural sensitivity concerning the Gaeltacht people of Ireland - a concept analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Israel's 2010 capitation reform and the widening of regional health disparities: A difference-in-differences analysis.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
See all related articles

Prioritizing health prevention programs is crucial, especially with limited resources. This study introduces a method to compare prevention strategies based on their efficiency and impact on public health outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Policy
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Renewed international focus on health prevention, exemplified by the World Health Organization's "Health for All by the Year 2000" strategy.
  • Increasing importance of resource allocation and priority setting in healthcare, particularly in contexts of scarcity.
  • The need for systematic evaluation of preventive interventions alongside curative care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel method for comparing different health prevention programs.
  • To establish efficiency as the key parameter for evaluating and prioritizing prevention strategies.
  • To provide a framework for evidence-based decision-making in public health interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a comparative methodology for prevention programs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of critical data points for assessing program efficiency.
  • Utilizing efficiency as the primary metric for program comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method allows for quantitative comparison of diverse prevention programs.
    • Efficiency assessment requires data on the health problem's scale, preventability, costs, and expected impact on morbidity/mortality.
    • The study outlines the necessary data collection for determining program efficiency.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic approach to comparing prevention programs based on efficiency is essential for effective resource allocation.
    • The described method provides a structured way to evaluate and prioritize public health interventions.
    • Implementing this method can lead to more impactful and cost-effective prevention strategies.