Related Experiment Videos

Study amends lore about CABG volume, cost

Modern Healthcare
|November 30, 1992
PubMed

Insights

High-quality healthcare, such as coronary artery bypass graft surgery, may not always be more expensive. Hospital volume is not the sole determinant of superior patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • The healthcare quality movement often assumes superior care is less costly.
  • High-volume hospitals are frequently presumed to provide higher quality care.
  • The relationship between cost, volume, and outcomes in complex procedures requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the relationship between hospital volume, cost, and quality of care for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries.
  • To identify common factors among hospitals achieving superior outcomes in CABG procedures.
  • To challenge the conventional wisdom that best care always costs less.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Medicare data for coronary artery bypass graft surgeries.
  • Comparative study of hospital performance based on volume and outcomes.
  • Identification of common denominators in high-performing hospitals.

Main Results:

  • The assumption that best care is always less expensive was challenged.
  • High volume was often associated with higher quality, but low volume did not preclude superior outcomes.
  • Specific common factors were identified in hospitals with consistently superior CABG outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare quality and cost are not always inversely related.
  • Hospital volume is an important but not exclusive predictor of surgical quality.
  • Understanding the characteristics of high-performing hospitals can inform quality improvement initiatives.

Related Concept Videos