Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dangerous diagnosis.

J Kosterlitz

    National Journal
    |December 24, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Policy experts predict public sacrifice during healthcare reform, but the public anticipates no such thing. This disconnect could lead to significant political backlash against proposed health system changes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Income security. Do it yourself.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Stern measures.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Rise of the medical savings account.

    National journal·1996
    Same author

    Unmanaged care?

    National journal·1994
    Same author

    Doctors' lobby tries to heal itself.

    National journal·1994
    Same author

    Signs of life in the wreckage.

    National journal·1994

    Area of Science:

    • Health policy analysis
    • Political science
    • Public opinion research

    Background:

    • Healthcare reform is a complex policy area often necessitating public adjustments.
    • Public perception significantly influences the success of major policy initiatives.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the discrepancy between policy expert assumptions and public expectations regarding healthcare reform.
    • To assess the potential political ramifications of this perceived gap.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of policy expert assumptions on healthcare reform.
    • Survey or polling data on public expectations for healthcare reform.
    • Political impact assessment based on public-private perception divergence.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • A significant divergence exists between expert expectations of public sacrifice and public anticipation.
    • The public does not foresee personal sacrifices related to the proposed healthcare overhaul.
    • This gap in perception poses a risk of political backlash.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare reform initiatives must align with public expectations to avoid political opposition.
    • Understanding and addressing public perception is crucial for successful policy implementation.
    • Failure to bridge the expert-public understanding gap may undermine reform efforts and political support.