Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Policy issues in a non-heart-beating donor protocol.

J A Robertson1

  • 1School of Law, University of Texas at Austin.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|May 8, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remarks on Iritis.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Remarks on Amaurosis, with Cases.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Sleep disturbance in patients taking opioid medication for chronic back pain.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Renewal of Menstruation and Subsequent Pregnancy after Removal of Both Ovaries.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Physicians rally against threat of a nuclear epidemic.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Chalk river nuclear laboratories.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same journal

On the Dangers of Cancer Exceptionalism in Pain Medicine.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Suck It Up and Stay on the Grind: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Trust, Chronic Pain, and the American Workplace.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

<i>Morbus Mediterraneus</i>: A Cultural Alibi for an Unequal Pain Burden.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Beyond Words: A Philosophical Analysis of the Linguistic Refractoriness of Chronic Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

When "Good-Enough" Treatment Is Not Good Enough: Epistemic Injustice, Pain-Related Motivational Deficit, and Epistemic Deflection in the Treatment of Gynecological Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

The Silent Struggle: A Woman's Journey Through Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
See all related articles

The Pittsburgh protocol for organ donation is ethically sound but requires further research for practical implementation. Its public policy value hinges on organ yield and public perception of organ donation.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Organ Transplantation

Background:

  • The Pittsburgh protocol is a controversial method for organ procurement.
  • Ethical and legal considerations surrounding organ donation protocols are paramount.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical and legal acceptability of the Pittsburgh protocol.
  • To assess the conditions necessary for its ethical implementation.
  • To determine its potential impact as public policy.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical and legal analysis of the Pittsburgh protocol.
  • Consideration of implementation procedures and their ethical implications.
  • Evaluation of potential organ yield and public attitude shifts.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaHealth Care and Public HealthUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The Pittsburgh protocol is deemed ethically and legally acceptable in its current form.
  • Further research is necessary to ensure its ethical implementation in practice.
  • Symbolic concerns regarding respect for the deceased are more prominent than substantive patient harm.

Conclusions:

  • The protocol's ethical standing is confirmed, but practical ethical implementation needs validation.
  • Public policy desirability depends on organ generation and public acceptance.
  • The core controversy lies in symbolic respect, not direct patient harm.