Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How recalibration method, pricing, and coding affect DRG weights.

G M Carter1, J A Rogowski

  • 1RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90407.

Health Care Financing Review
|December 4, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the robustness of polarization attraction for 10.7-GBaud NRZ-BPSK after long-haul 100-GHz DWDM transmission.

Optics express·2018
Same author

Polarization attraction of 10-Gb/s NRZ-BPSK signal in a highly nonlinear fiber.

Optics express·2017
Same author

Higher incidence of HCV in females compared to males who inject drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of viral hepatitis·2016
Same author

Polarization-insensitive all-optical dual pump-phase transmultiplexing from 2 × 10-GBd OOKs to 10-GBd RZ-QPSK using cross-phase modulation in a birefringent nonlinear PCF.

Optics express·2015
Same author

All-optical amplitude-phase transmultiplexing of RZ-OOK and RZ-BPSK to RZ-QPSK by polarization-insensitive XPM using a nonlinear birefringent AlGaAs waveguide.

Optics express·2013
Same author

Directly modulated diode laser frequency doubled in a KTP waveguide as an excitation source for CO2 and O2 phase fluorometric sensors.

Journal of biomedical optics·2012
Same journal

Health Care Indicators.

Health care financing review·2014
Same journal

Achieving cost control in the hospital outpatient department.

Health care financing review·2014
Same journal

Age Estimates in the National Health Accounts.

Health care financing review·2014
Same journal

Managed care: Practice, pitfalls, and potential.

Health care financing review·2014
Same journal

Overview.

Health care financing review·2014
Same journal

Research Issues: Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries, Challenges and Opportunities.

Health care financing review·2014
See all related articles

Comparing hospital payment systems, we found that both standard and hospital-specific relative-value (HSRV) methods had weight compression issues. However, both accurately estimated hospital costs, with HSRV weights showing greater compression but more outlier cases.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Billing

Background:

  • The prospective payment system (PPS) utilizes diagnosis-related group (DRG) weights for hospital reimbursement.
  • Evaluating DRG weight calculation methodologies is crucial for accurate healthcare payments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare DRG weights calculated using the hospital-specific relative-value (HSRV) methodology versus the standard methodology from 1985-1989.
  • To analyze the differences and impact of these methodologies on payment weights and cost estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of DRG weights derived from HSRV and standard methodologies over five years (1985-1989).
  • Detailed examination of weight compression and cross-subsidization effects in 1989.
  • Assessment of the accuracy of both weight sets in estimating hospital-level costs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests classification error and case-mix subsidies caused weight compression in the early PPS years.
  • Standard methodology weights showed less compression due to a correlation offsetting cross-subsidization.
  • HSRV weights exhibited greater compression due to sensitivity to cross-subsidies, but both methods yielded comparable cost estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Both HSRV and standard DRG weight methodologies produced similar estimates of hospital costs, net of outlier payments.
  • Weight compression was observed in both systems, particularly in earlier PPS years, influenced by classification errors and case-mix subsidies.
  • The HSRV method's greater weight compression was balanced by a higher rate of qualifying outlier cases.