Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Ethics, DRGs and medical record administrators.

A J Braunack-Mayer¹

¹Department of Community Medicine, University of Adelaide, S.A.

Australian Medical Record Journal

|February 7, 1993

Summary

The introduction of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) has created ethical challenges for medical record administrators in both the US and Australia. These issues often stem from power imbalances with other healthcare professionals.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Legal impediments to data linkage.

Journal of law and medicine·2012

Same author

An ethics core curriculum for Australasian medical Schools.

The Medical journal of Australia·2001

Same author

Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other?

Medical education·2001

Same author

What makes a problem an ethical problem? An empirical perspective on the nature of ethical problems in general practice.

Journal of medical ethics·2001

Area of Science:

Healthcare Administration
Medical Ethics
Health Information Management

Background:

The implementation of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) has significantly impacted healthcare systems globally.
Medical record administrators face unique challenges in adapting to DRG-based reimbursement models.
Ethical dilemmas have been reported by medical record professionals in the United States due to DRGs.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the ethical challenges faced by medical record administrators in Australia and the United States concerning DRGs.
To analyze the implications of DRG implementation for Australian medical record administrators.
To identify the root causes of ethical problems experienced by these professionals.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of experiences in the United States and Australia.
Qualitative description of ethical problems encountered.
Examination of power dynamics within healthcare settings.

Main Results:

Similar ethical problems were identified in both countries, although experiences may differ.
Ethical issues are exacerbated by power imbalances between medical record administrators and other health professions.
The advent of DRGs has highlighted existing professional hierarchies.

Conclusions:

Australian medical record administrators face ethical challenges comparable to their US counterparts due to DRGs.
Addressing power imbalances is crucial for mitigating ethical problems in health information management.
Further research is needed to explore strategies for supporting medical record administrators in DRG environments.

Related Experiment Videos