Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Practice parameters and outcomes measurement: managing for quality.

J Barlow1

  • 1Center for Research in Ambulatory Health Care Admistration (CRAHCA), Englewood, CO 80112.

Medical Group Management Journal
|December 9, 1993
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how medical practices can define and use performance standards to improve quality. The researchers interviewed several clinics and developed assessments to help with this process. They found that clear parameters and structured assessments are important for tracking outcomes. The study also highlights common challenges, such as lack of resources and unclear guidelines. The authors recommend using the assessments as a starting point for clinics looking to improve their quality management. The findings suggest that with the right tools and training, practices can better manage their performance and outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for the Y(2175) in the Photoproduction Cross Section Measurement of γp→ϕπ^{+}π^{-}p at GlueX.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Tree diversity is changing across tropical Andean and Amazonian forests in response to global change.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Tree diversity is changing across tropical Andean and Amazonian forests in response to global change.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Upper Limit on the Photoproduction Cross Section of the Spin-Exotic π_{1}(1600).

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

The Middle-Out Perspective: an approach to formalise 'normal practice' in public health advocacy.

Perspectives in public health·2022
Same author

The credibility plot for extreme explanations and all explanations in between.

Anaesthesia·2022

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality improvement
  • Medical practice management
  • Outcomes research in clinical settings

Background:

Medical practices often struggle to define consistent benchmarks for performance. Prior research has shown that quality management systems rely on measurable standards. However, no prior work had resolved how to effectively implement these standards. That uncertainty drove the need for a practical framework. Establishing these benchmarks remains a challenge for many clinics. Existing literature outlines the importance of outcomes tracking. Yet, it lacks actionable guidance for implementation. This gap motivated a closer look at practice parameters. The study aimed to clarify how these standards could be applied in real-world settings.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to explore how medical practices define and use performance metrics. The researchers wanted to understand the challenges in implementing these metrics. They focused on the relationship between standards and outcomes. The motivation came from the need for better quality management tools. The study aimed to provide practical recommendations for clinics. It sought to bridge the gap between theory and application. The researchers interviewed multiple practices to gather insights. These insights would help shape a clearer approach to outcomes management.

Keywords:
Quality improvement in healthcareMedical practice standardsOutcomes measurementHealthcare performance tracking

Frequently Asked Questions

The study suggests that clear parameters improve outcomes tracking and performance.

Assessments help evaluate the effectiveness of current methods and identify areas for improvement.

The researchers propose that training helps practices overcome barriers and use the tools effectively.

Common challenges included lack of resources and unclear guidelines for implementation.

They provide a framework for evaluating performance and identifying areas for improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers conducted interviews with various medical practices. They focused on how these practices define and apply performance standards. The interviews aimed to uncover common challenges and solutions. The team developed assessments based on the findings. They used these assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of current methods. The approach combined qualitative insights with structured analysis. The study did not rely on quantitative data alone. Instead, it emphasized practical strategies for implementation.

Main Results:

The study found that defining clear parameters is essential for quality management. Practices that used structured assessments reported better outcomes. The researchers noted that consistent measurement improves performance tracking. They identified common barriers to implementing these standards. These barriers included lack of resources and unclear guidelines. The assessments revealed that some practices struggled with data collection. The study also found that training was a key factor in successful implementation. The recommendations provided a framework for addressing these challenges.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that structured assessments help in managing quality. They propose that clear parameters improve outcomes tracking. The study highlights the need for training and resources in implementation. The findings indicate that consistent measurement leads to better performance. The researchers recommend using the developed assessments as a starting point. They emphasize that these tools can help clinics improve their standards. The study supports the idea that outcomes management is achievable with the right tools. The authors suggest that these methods can be adapted to different practice settings.

They suggest using the developed assessments as a starting point for improving quality management.