Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years): a nurse's view.

C A Holmes1

  • 1Faculty of Nursing, Deakin University, Australia.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
|December 9, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phase and amplitude dynamics of nonlinearly coupled oscillators.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2015
Same author

Synchronization in a mechanical resonator array coupled quadratically to a common electromagnetic field mode.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Synchronization of many nanomechanical resonators coupled via a common cavity field.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2012
Same author

Critical fluctuations in cortical models near instability.

Frontiers in physiology·2012
Same author

Treatment of impetigo neonatorum with minimal doses of penicillin.

American journal of diseases of children (1911)·2010
Same author

Understanding clinical decision making for PRN medication in mental health inpatient facilities.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2010

Quality of life measures, like Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), have political significance. Critiquing health aspirations requires acknowledging socio-economic and cultural factors in quality of life assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Bioethics
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Quality of life measures are increasingly used in health policy and resource allocation.
  • Debates exist regarding the economic and political functions of these measures.
  • Existing approaches may overlook the complex interplay of factors influencing perceived quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the political and ideological significance of quality of life measures, specifically Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).
  • To critique current health aspirations by analyzing the dialectic between quality of life conceptions and socio-economic, ecological, political, and cultural factors.
  • To highlight how neglecting this dialectic jeopardizes the utility of quality of life measures in health policy.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of recent developments in the debate on economic and political functions of quality of life measures.
  • Conceptual analysis of the dialectic between quality of life conceptions and realpolitik factors.
  • Critique of existing approaches to quality of life assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality of life measures, including QALYs, possess significant political and ideological weight.
    • A dialectical approach, integrating socio-economic pressures, ecological conditions, political ethos, and cultural norms, is crucial for a robust critique of health aspirations.
    • Current methods for assessing quality of life often fail to incorporate this dialectic, limiting their contribution to health policy.

    Conclusions:

    • The political and ideological dimensions of quality of life measures must be acknowledged for effective health policy.
    • Developing openly ideological strategies and measures is essential for addressing resource allocation challenges.
    • A more comprehensive understanding of quality of life, incorporating its socio-political context, is needed to improve health planning, implementation, and evaluation.