Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical audit: the problem of missing case-notes.

A Yoong1, C Hudson, T Chard

  • 1St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.

Health Trends
|December 9, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Older but none the wiser?

British dental journal·2025
Same author

Older but none the wiser?

British dental journal·2025
Same author

Deployment of whole genome next-generation sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in a military maritime setting.

BMJ military health·2023
Same author

Development and operation of the defence COVID-19 lab as a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic screening capability for UK military personnel.

BMJ military health·2022
Same author

Abscess to care.

British dental journal·2020
Same author

Evaluating a pilot mental health awareness for managers' training course.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2019

Missing antenatal patient data significantly impacts audit accuracy, leading to worse delivery outcomes. Computerized obstetric records can improve data completeness and reduce bias in clinical audits.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Auditing

Background:

  • Antenatal risk factor identification is crucial for optimizing obstetric care.
  • Clinical audits are essential for evaluating and improving healthcare quality.
  • Data completeness is a prerequisite for reliable audit findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To audit antenatal risk factors identified at booking visits.
  • To assess the clinical actions taken based on identified risk factors.
  • To evaluate the impact of missing case-note data on audit results.

Main Methods:

  • Case-note audit of 2,139 women booked via an obstetric computer system.
  • Analysis of delivery outcomes for women with and without missing booking information.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of outcomes between computer-booked and manually-booked patients.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant proportion (6.4%) of case-notes were missing.
    • Missing data was associated with substantially worse delivery outcomes, including higher rates of perinatal death, preterm labor, low Apgar scores, and low birth weight.
    • Manually booked women showed higher incidences of perinatal death and low Apgar scores compared to computer-booked women.

    Conclusions:

    • Missing information in clinical audits introduces significant bias, potentially skewing findings.
    • The under-reporting of adverse outcomes in audits due to missing data can mask critical issues.
    • Enhanced use of computer-based medical record systems is recommended to improve data integrity and reduce audit bias, though hybrid systems may still present challenges.