Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimizing bias in industry-sponsored outcomes research.

R A Freeman1

  • 1Sterling Winthrop Laboratories, New York 10016.

Medical Interface
|March 9, 1994
PubMed
Summary

Industry funding in outcomes research raises concerns about bias and credibility due to marketing links. Adhering to established research principles ensures scientific integrity, regardless of sponsorship.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The sub-man.

The Eugenics review·2011
Same author

Segregation of the fit: A plea for positive eugenics.

The Eugenics review·2011
Same author

Eugenics and democracy.

The Eugenics review·2011
Same author

Synthesis of 2-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-4-(aminomethyl)imidazole analogues and their binding affinities for dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors.

Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry·2001
Same author

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of naphthamides as dopamine D3 receptor ligands.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2001
Same author

Characterization of (125)I-IABN, a novel azabicyclononane benzamide selective for D2-like dopamine receptors.

Synapse (New York, N.Y.)·2000

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Pharmaceutical Policy
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Industry sponsorship of research, particularly outcomes research, faces scrutiny regarding potential bias and credibility.
  • Direct links between industry-funded studies and drug marketing activities can lead to perceptions of compromised objectivity.
  • Public policy and private sector decision-makers are increasingly focused on the integrity of sponsored research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address concerns surrounding industry sponsorship in outcomes research.
  • To emphasize the importance of established principles in maintaining research quality.
  • To advocate for the consistent application of rigorous methodologies irrespective of funding source.

Main Methods:

  • This abstract does not detail specific methodologies but discusses principles for assessing outcomes research.
  • Focuses on the application of widely accepted principles for conducting and evaluating research.
  • Highlights the need for transparency and adherence to ethical standards.

Main Results:

  • Industry sponsorship can create a perception of bias in outcomes research.
  • Credibility of industry-funded research is often questioned due to its association with marketing.
  • Established principles for good research practice are crucial for maintaining integrity.

Conclusions:

  • Outcomes research funded by industry requires careful assessment to mitigate perceived bias.
  • Adherence to widely accepted principles of research conduct is essential for all outcomes research.
  • Methodological standards and ethical conduct should be prioritized, irrespective of the funding source.

Related Experiment Videos