Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Narratives of construct validation.

J D Engel1

  • 1Jefferson Medical College.

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|May 8, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study critiques construct validation's origins, examining its rhetorical, empirical, and philosophical aspects. It proposes a new conceptualization of construct validation relevant to the measurement community.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pathologic analysis of capsular and incisional denudation and positive margin status in the development of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy program.

Journal of robotic surgery·2016
Same author

In vivo requirements for GATA-1 functional domains during primitive and definitive erythropoiesis.

The EMBO journal·2001
Same author

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: the experience of the inexperienced.

Journal of endourology·2001
Same author

Reconstitution of human beta-globin locus control region hypersensitive sites in the absence of chromatin assembly.

Molecular and cellular biology·2001
Same author

In vivo modulation of human beta-globin gene switching.

Trends in cardiovascular medicine·2001
Same author

Positive or negative MARE-dependent transcriptional regulation is determined by the abundance of small Maf proteins.

Cell·2001
Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • The concept of construct validation emerged within a specific socio-political milieu.
  • Understanding its historical context is crucial for contemporary interpretations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the social and political factors influencing the development of construct validation.
  • To explore the rhetorical, empirical, and philosophical dimensions of construct validation.
  • To propose an alternative conceptualization of construct validation.

Main Methods:

  • Critical discourse analysis of the historical development of construct validation.
  • Examination of philosophical underpinnings and empirical applications.
  • Literature review of current measurement community treatments.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The development of construct validation is intertwined with social and political contexts.
  • Rhetorical, empirical, and philosophical elements shape the concept.
  • Existing treatments can be enhanced by an alternative viewpoint.

Conclusions:

  • A nuanced understanding of construct validation requires acknowledging its historical and contextual roots.
  • The proposed alternative conceptualization offers a new perspective for the measurement community.
  • Further dialogue is needed to integrate this viewpoint into ongoing discussions on construct validation.