Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026
04:46
'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
Measuring outcomes of nutrition intervention
Journal of the Canadian Dietetic Association
|February 2, 1995
Summary
The Canadian Dietetic Association promotes health outcomes assessment. Defining and measuring these outcomes is challenging, especially in dietetics, due to multifactorial influences on nutrition status.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Nutrition Science
- Professional Development
Background:
- The Canadian Dietetic Association (CDA) is promoting outcomes assessment among its members.
- Outcomes assessment is a continuous process involving defining and measuring consequences of healthcare.
- Nutrition status can be influenced by factors beyond direct nutrition interventions, complicating direct outcome linkage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the process and challenges of outcomes assessment within the dietetic profession.
- To review the approaches of other health professional associations regarding outcome measurement.
- To understand the difficulties encountered in linking interventions to outcomes in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Review of work from other professional associations, including the American Dietetic Association and Canadian Nurses Association.
- Examination of how expert committees and task forces are addressing outcome measurement.
- Analysis of the challenges faced by various health professions in implementing outcomes assessment.
Main Results:
- Professional associations, including the CDA, face difficulties and time-consuming processes in defining and measuring outcomes.
- Multiple health professions are establishing expert committees to address outcome measurement.
- There is a trend towards using outcome information to improve practice and question the necessity of interventions.
Conclusions:
- Outcomes assessment is a complex and ongoing challenge for the dietetic profession and other healthcare fields.
- Collaboration and learning from other professional associations are crucial for advancing outcomes assessment.
- The ultimate goal is to enhance healthcare delivery and ensure the effectiveness of interventions through outcome evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Several factors are considered while creating a patient's care plan. Motivation is a factor in improving communication, and patients often require encouragement to try different approaches involving significant change. It is essential to involve the patient and family in decisions about the plan of care to determine whether the suggested methods are acceptable. Consider meeting critical comfort and safety needs before introducing new communication methods and techniques. Allow adequate time for...
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
01:30Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Pharmacokinetics is a vital branch of pharmacology that examines how drugs are absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted by the body. Two key methodologies in pharmacokinetics are plasma drug concentration studies and urinary drug excretion analyses, both of which provide critical insights into a drug's therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability.Plasma Drug Concentration-Time StudiesPlasma drug concentration-time studies involve analyzing blood samples at specific intervals to quantify...
01:20Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.