Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Point and counterpoint. Should HECs make de facto binding decisions?

L L Brunetti, W J Ellos

    HEC Forum : an Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues
    |April 8, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Some narrative methodologies for clinical ethics.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·1998
    Same author

    Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps.

    Archives of internal medicine·1994
    Same author

    The malpractice mess.

    The New England journal of medicine·1994
    Same author

    Physicians' attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Journal of general internal medicine·1991
    Same author

    The ethics of surreptitious diagnostics for factitious hypoglycemia.

    The Journal of clinical ethics·1990
    Same author

    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation policies and practices. A statewide nursing home study.

    Archives of internal medicine·1990
    Same journal

    A Commentary on Ethics Case Reflections as an Ethics laboratory in Clinical Practice.

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    Same journal

    From Cyberchondria to Spatial Anxiety: How Much Should I Worry About My Well-Being?

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    Same journal

    Moral Considerations of Patient Participation in Moral Case Deliberation: An Explorative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals, (Parents of) Patients and Facilitators.

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    Same journal

    On the Formation of Professional Identity in Clinical Ethics Consultation: Future or Illusion?

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    Same journal

    Community Input on NRP: Establishing Ethical Guidelines for Normothermic Regional Perfusion Through Community and Professional Engagement.

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    Same journal

    A Survey of Ethics Review Committees in New York State Hospitals: Key Findings and Lessons.

    HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
    See all related articles

    Hospital ethics committees (HECs) have binding decisions impacting patient care. Recognizing their influence is crucial for healthcare institutions to optimize decision-making processes.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Healthcare Administration
    • Patient Advocacy

    Background:

    • Hospital ethics committees (HECs) play a critical role in navigating complex patient care decisions.
    • Recent legislation, including the Patient Self-Determination Act, and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) rules, have increased the importance of ethical dispute resolution.
    • The de facto binding nature of HEC decisions necessitates a deeper understanding of their impact.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the significant influence of hospital ethics committee decisions on patient care.
    • To emphasize the need for healthcare institutions to understand and leverage the power of HECs.
    • To guide healthcare providers in optimizing the use of HEC resources for enhanced patient care decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    Keywords:
    Bioethics and Professional Ethics

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Analysis of the implications of HEC decisions within the current healthcare regulatory landscape.
    • Review of the impact of legislative and accreditation mandates on HEC functions.
    • Conceptual framework for enhancing the utilization of HEC powers in patient care.

    Main Results:

    • HEC decisions are de facto binding and have direct implications for patient care.
    • The influence of HECs is growing due to legislative and accreditation requirements for ethical dispute resolution.
    • There is a clear need for healthcare institutions to proactively manage and utilize HEC capabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare institutions and medical staff must acknowledge the binding nature of HEC decisions.
    • Strategic utilization of HEC powers is essential for improving patient care decision-making.
    • Proactive engagement with HEC processes is vital for navigating ethical challenges in healthcare.