Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reporting tools for clinical quality improvement.

J M Albright1, R J Panzer, E R Black

  • 1Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY 14620.

Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care
|September 5, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trichloroacetic Acid Ingestion: Self-Harm Attempt.

Case reports in psychiatry·2017
Same author

Lawyers, litigation, and liability: can they make patients safer?

Neurology·2001
Same author

Introduction to human health and illness: a series of patient-centered conferences based on the biopsychosocial model.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2000
Same author

1995 Fast Track: cost reduction and improvement.

Quality management in health care·1998
Same author

Diagnostic strategies and test algorithms in liver disease.

Clinical chemistry·1997
Same author

The appropriateness of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in academic medical centers. Working Group of the Appropriateness Project of the Academic Medical Center Consortium.

Annals of internal medicine·1996

Clinical quality improvement (QI) relies on effective analysis tools. Comparative screening and benchmarking identify areas for improvement, enhancing patient care and hospital performance.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Quality Improvement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Effective quality analysis tools are crucial for clinical quality improvement (QI).
  • Routine assessment activities require innovative strategies for data-driven decision-making.
  • Healthcare organizations must adapt to evolving quality metrics and reporting requirements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate novel strategies for clinical quality improvement.
  • To demonstrate the utility of comparative screening and clinical process benchmarking.
  • To support targeted quality initiatives and enhance patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative screening of clinical data across 11 medical centers for mortality, readmission, and length of stay.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing diagnosis-related groups and ICD-9-CM clusters for meaningful clinical comparisons.
  • Implementing clinical process benchmarking through interfacility communication to identify best practices.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparative reports enable clinical leaders and administrators to focus QI activities.
    • Benchmarking successfully supported process improvements in cardiac surgery, patient-controlled analgesia, and respiratory therapy.
    • Identified key clinical processes associated with better outcomes through collated interfacility data.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparative screening and benchmarking are effective tools for clinical quality improvement.
    • Interdisciplinary QI teams can leverage external data and peer collaboration for targeted enhancements.
    • The strategies support achieving specific quality and utilization goals, such as reducing readmissions and length of stay.