Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative hospital databases: value for management and quality.

R Cleary1, R Beard, J Coles

  • 1CASPE Research, London.

Quality in Health Care : QHC
|February 7, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of ion acceleration and diffusion in a laser-driven magnetized plasma.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Demonstration of a mobile optical clock ensemble at sea.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Conventional oxygen therapy versus CPAP as a ceiling of care in ward-based patients with COVID-19: a multi-centre cohort evaluation.

EClinicalMedicine·2021
Same author

A review of telephone consultations for head and neck cancer follow up: a patient satisfaction survey.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
Same author

Recovery of stem cell proliferation by low intensity vibration under simulated microgravity requires LINC complex.

NPJ microgravity·2019
Same author

Correction: Genetic risk for schizophrenia and psychosis in Alzheimer disease.

Molecular psychiatry·2019
Same journal

Effectiveness of laxatives in adults.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Understanding the organisational context for adverse events in the health services: the role of cultural censorship.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

A very public failure: lessons for quality improvement in healthcare organisations from the Bristol Royal Infirmary.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision making.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
Same journal

Influence of evidence-based guidance on health policy and clinical practice in England.

Quality in health care : QHC·2001
See all related articles

Establishing a reliable discharge abstract database is crucial for quality of care assessments. Current hospital data extraction methods are insufficient, but improved abstractor techniques show promise for better clinical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Informatics
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Accurate discharge abstracts are essential for evaluating healthcare quality.
  • Existing hospital information systems often lack sufficient detail for comparative analysis.
  • Challenges exist in accessing and coding data from patient case notes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create an accurate and reliable comparative database of discharge abstracts.
  • To assess the value of such a database for quality of care assessments.
  • To compare data extraction methods used by hospitals versus trained abstractors.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of case notes by trained research abstractors.
  • Comparison with data from hospitals' routine information systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of medical, surgical, and obstetric cases from multiple hospitals.
  • Main Results:

    • Hospital systems provided insufficient detail for medical/surgical case analysis.
    • Research abstractors significantly increased diagnostic code extraction (doubled codes).
    • Achieved ~70% inter-abstractor agreement for primary diagnosis and DRG assignment.
    • Obstetric data extraction rates were comparable between abstractors and hospital systems (SMMIS).

    Conclusions:

    • Current methods for extracting and coding discharge data are unsatisfactory due to poor accessibility and incomplete recording.
    • Trained abstractors can create a more comprehensive comparative database.
    • Improvements in data extraction are feasible and valuable for clinical and managerial activities within the NHS.