Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative audit between hospitals: the example of appendectomy.

N A Black1, L Moore

  • 1Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
|December 9, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining constructs of high-quality rural health student placements: a multiple case ECOUTER study.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Validation of a stall-side immunoglobulin assay for use in equine reproductive management.

Equine veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Dynamic infrared aurora on Jupiter.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Multi-disciplinary mass burn casualty simulation exercise.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2024
Same author

Delivering Care for Pregnant Women with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Irish medical journal·2024
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum 2018: St. John's, NL Sept. 13-15, 2018.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same journal

A DEMATEL-based model to analyze causal factors affecting patients' informed consent.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
Same journal

Examining the relationship between perceived behavioral control and purchasing intention toward health insurance with a moderating effect of demographics.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
Same journal

Health insurance, health care utilization and health outcomes in Nigeria: evidence from DHS data.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
Same journal

Leveraging the MBNQA framework to advance quality assurance in healthcare.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
Same journal

Hospital service quality and patient loyalty: a comparative analysis of government and private hospitals in Chhattisgarh.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
Same journal

Technology meets trust: a UTAUT-driven exploration of AI-based medical device implementation in healthcare.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2026
See all related articles

Routine comparative audit systems can reveal variations in surgical practices, but small sample sizes and data accuracy issues limit statistical significance. Overcoming these challenges can make audits useful for identifying unusual practices and guiding research.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Audit
  • Clinical Governance

Background:

  • Comparative audit systems are tools for evaluating healthcare quality.
  • Assessing the utility of these systems is crucial for improving patient care.
  • Variations in clinical practice can impact patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the usefulness of routine, comparative audit systems.
  • To analyze variations in appendectomy procedures across surgeons.
  • To identify potential areas for clinical practice improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of appendectomy data from 17 surgeons (January-June 1990).
  • Comparison of case-mix, clinical management, diagnostic accuracy, and patient outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis of variations in care aspects.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variations observed in patient demographics, length of stay, antibiotic use, diagnostic accuracy, and infection rates.
    • Small sample sizes per surgeon (mean 23.6 cases) limited statistical significance of observed differences.
    • Concerns regarding data accuracy were noted.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparative audit systems show potential for identifying unusual clinical practices.
    • Methodological challenges, such as sample size and data accuracy, need to be addressed.
    • Audits can generate hypotheses for further evaluative research in healthcare.