Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tort reform proposals: a toolbox for change.

R Leventhal

    Health Care Law Newsletter
    |August 6, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary

    Tort reform debates highlight the conflict between healthcare cost containment and compensating injured patients. Current reform efforts lack comprehensive studies, relying on anecdotal evidence and special interests.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Midazolam versus diazepam for combined esophogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

    Digestive diseases and sciences·1989
    Same author

    Pneumatosis intestinalis and pneumoperitoneum after sclerotherapy.

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1988
    Same author

    Ascaris suum: T-cell responses of C57BL/6J mice in vitro and in vivo.

    Experimental parasitology·1981
    Same author

    The spin method for recovering tissue larvae and its use in evaluating C57BL/6 mice as a model for the study of resistance to infection with Ascaris suum.

    The Journal of parasitology·1978
    Same author

    The role of complement in Ascaris suum induced histopathology.

    Clinical and experimental immunology·1978
    Same author

    Ascaris suum: cuticular binding of the third component of complement by early larval stages.

    Experimental parasitology·1977

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Public Health Policy
    • Healthcare Economics

    Background:

    • Medical malpractice litigation presents a complex challenge, balancing economic factors with patient rights.
    • Existing tort reform proposals often lack robust empirical support, influenced by anecdotal evidence and special interest advocacy.
    • The absence of comprehensive federal legislation necessitates state-level innovation in addressing malpractice claims.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the core controversies surrounding medical malpractice tort reform.
    • To evaluate the influence of anecdotal evidence and special interests on reform debates.
    • To examine the implications of federal inaction on state-level malpractice reform initiatives.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of existing tort reform literature and policy debates.
    • Review of arguments presented by proponents and opponents of various reform measures.
    • Examination of the role of empirical studies versus anecdotal evidence in shaping reform discourse.

    Main Results:

    • The central conflict in tort reform lies in reconciling cost-efficiency with plaintiff compensation.
    • Reform discussions are frequently driven by anecdotal accounts and stakeholder interests, rather than data-driven research.
    • Federal legislative progress on malpractice reform remains slow, leading to fragmented state-level approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective tort reform requires a careful balance between economic considerations and the rights of injured parties.
    • Policy decisions regarding malpractice reform should be informed by rigorous studies, not solely by anecdotal evidence or special interest influence.
    • The current landscape suggests a continued reliance on state-specific solutions for medical malpractice reform in the foreseeable future.

    Related Experiment Videos