Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surfing Stark II: prohibition against self-referrals.

H J Swibel1, M J Zaremski

  • 1Arnstein & Lehr, Chicago, IL.

Physician Executive
|January 8, 1995
PubMed
Summary

The Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (Stark I) and its amendments (Stark II) restrict physician referrals of Medicare patients to entities with financial ties. This article outlines guidelines for compliance with these healthcare laws.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interview with Miles J. Zaremski, Esq.

Quality management in health care·1999
Same author

Recent developments in medicine and law.

Tort & insurance law journal·1998
Same author

Computerization: reengineering the lawyering process for the 21st century.

Physician executive·1995
Same author

The business plan to manage high-damage liability lawsuits.

Physician executive·1994
Same author

Daubert v Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom.

JAMA·1993
Same author

Judging science.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1993

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Medical Economics
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • The Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (Stark I) was introduced in 1989 to address conflicts of interest in healthcare.
  • Stark I, incorporated into the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, primarily targeted physician referrals to clinical laboratories with financial relationships.
  • Amendments known as Stark II expanded these prohibitions, taking effect in 1995.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the key provisions of the Stark I and Stark II laws.
  • To provide guidance for healthcare providers navigating the requirements of these physician self-referral regulations.
  • To ensure compliance with federal regulations concerning financial relationships and patient referrals in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the legislative history and substance of the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (Stark I).
  • Examination of the amendments introduced through Stark II and their impact on healthcare providers.
  • Development of practical guidelines for successful adherence to Stark I and Stark II requirements.

Main Results:

  • Stark I prohibits physicians from referring Medicare patients to clinical laboratories in which they have a financial interest.
  • Laboratories must report ownership arrangements with referring physicians.
  • Stark II broadened the scope of prohibited referrals, necessitating updated compliance strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Healthcare providers must understand and comply with Stark I and Stark II to avoid penalties.
  • Adherence to physician self-referral laws is crucial for maintaining ethical and legal healthcare practices.
  • The article offers essential guidelines for navigating complex healthcare referral regulations.

Related Experiment Videos