Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Incentives and provider payment methods.

H Barnum1, J Kutzin, H Saxenian

  • 1World Bank, Washington DC 20433, USA.

The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sustainable financing for Immunization Agenda 2030.

Vaccine·2022
Same author

Local quantum measurement and no-signaling imply quantum correlations.

Physical review letters·2010
Same author

Quantum simulations of classical annealing processes.

Physical review letters·2008
Same author

A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2001
Same author

Health for some? The effects of user fees in the Volta Region of Ghana.

Health policy and planning·2000
Same author

Investing in health wisely. The role of needs-based technology assessment.

International journal of technology assessment in health care·1995
Same journal

Unmet Need for Family Planning Among Married Women in Bangladesh: A Decade of Progress and Persisting Disparities.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
Same journal

Providing Mental Health and Substance Use Services to People Released From Custody During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Service Providers.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
Same journal

Human Resource Management, Complementarity and Hospital Performance: Evidence From the English NHS.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
Same journal

'I Took TB Medicine for Six Months Without Having TB': Personal and Institutional Factors Affecting Trust in Healthcare Among African Immigrants in Florida, United States.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of the Medical Brain Drain Attitudes Scale (MBDAS) in Turkey.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Knowledge About Human Papillomavirus and Vaccination Among Women Screened for Cervical Cancer.

The International journal of health planning and management·2026
See all related articles

Provider payment methods significantly influence healthcare outcomes and costs. Analyzing alternatives like capitation and fee-for-service reveals that competition and mixed systems can optimize performance, especially in low-income countries.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Healthcare policy
  • Public health

Background:

  • Provider payment mechanisms are central to health finance reforms, influencing efficiency, equity, and quality.
  • Understanding provider incentives and administrative costs is crucial for successful reform implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine provider incentives, administrative costs, and institutional conditions for implementing alternative provider payment methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of different payment models on healthcare system performance.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of provider payment alternatives including budget reforms, capitation, fee-for-service, and case-based reimbursement.
  • Assessment of administrative costs and institutional requirements for each payment method.
  • Consideration of the role of competition within public and private healthcare sectors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All payment methods, including fee-for-service and capitation, present both positive and negative incentives.
  • Competition, whether in regulated private or public systems, can enhance the effectiveness of any payment model.
  • Mixed provider payment systems offer flexibility to balance the drawbacks of individual methods.

Conclusions:

  • Provider payment systems significantly impact healthcare delivery and reform outcomes.
  • Competition and mixed payment models are key to improving healthcare system performance.
  • Complex payment systems should be avoided in low-income countries due to limited institutional capacity.