Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three choices for death.

E C Moroney1

  • 1Greater Victoria Hospital Society, British Columbia.

C.H.A.C. Review
|January 3, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Euthanasia, often disguised with terms like "direct" or "indirect," fundamentally remains an act of killing. This analysis critically examines the ethical implications and terminology surrounding euthanasia practices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why good people do bad things to the helpless.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same author

Needed: a new philosophy for treatment of the greatest sufferers.

C.H.A.C. review·1996
Same author

Three choices for death.

America·1992
Same author

What is death with dignity?

C.H.A.C. review·1992
Same journal

Rejuvenating hospital hospitality.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same journal

Celebrating sixty years. Faithful to a mission.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same journal

A page in the history of the Catholic Health Association of Canada.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same journal

Living ethically in Christ. Is Christian ethics unique?

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same journal

A healthy approach to autonomy: stemming the decline of ethics.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
Same journal

Focus on our seniors. International Year of Older Persons.

C.H.A.C. review·1999
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Euthanasia is a contentious issue with evolving terminology.
  • Qualifiers such as "direct" and "indirect" are used by proponents.
  • The core meaning of euthanasia, regardless of qualifiers, is questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the terminology used in euthanasia debates.
  • To examine the ethical implications of euthanasia, irrespective of qualifiers.
  • To assert that euthanasia, by definition, involves ending a life.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of ethical and lobbying language.
  • Review of public health and medical ethics discourse.
  • Examination of the semantic implications of qualifiers in euthanasia.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The terms "direct" and "indirect" euthanasia do not alter its fundamental nature as killing.
  • Ethicists and lobbyists employ these qualifiers to reframe the act.
  • The core ethical concern of ending a life persists.

Conclusions:

  • The use of qualifiers in euthanasia discourse is a semantic strategy.
  • The ethical debate must confront the act of killing directly.
  • Public health professionals should be vigilant about the language used in end-of-life discussions.