Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimum acetabular component fixation.

J B Stiehl1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Seminars in Arthroplasty
|June 7, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ten-year follow-up of the non-porous Allofit cementless acetabular component.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2009
Same author

Femoral component rotation in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

The Knee·2006
Same author

Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

International orthopaedics·2006
Same author

In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

The American journal of knee surgery·2002
Same author

Frontal plane kinematics after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2001
Same author

Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2001
Same journal

Influence of radiographic viewing perspective on the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Effect of Supplemental Testosterone Use on Shoulder Arthroplasty Infection Rates.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

The influence of sex: A Deep Dive into Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2025
Same journal

The effect of vitamin D insufficiency on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty: a single center retrospective examination.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2025
Same journal

Three-dimensional finite element modeling of glenoid bone loss and baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2024
Same journal

Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Were Not Adversely Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Seminars in arthroplasty·2023
See all related articles

Acetabular pressfit fixation is crucial for hip implant stability, requiring rigid initial fixation and bone preservation. A hemispherical cup with a 1-2 mm pressfit provides optimal fixation, making it the preferred method for most patients.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomaterials science
  • Implant technology

Background:

  • Acetabular fixation is essential for total hip arthroplasty success.
  • Achieving stable initial fixation while preserving subchondral bone is critical.
  • Biologic incorporation at the implant-bone interface influences long-term outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the optimal pressfit range for acetabular component fixation.
  • To assess the efficacy of adjunct fixation methods (screws/pegs) with pressfit cups.
  • To determine the ideal fixation strategy for acetabular components in hip arthroplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of biomechanical principles governing pressfit fixation.
  • Review of clinical outcomes associated with varying pressfit sizes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the impact of screws or pegs on pressfit stability.

    • Main Results:

    • Rigid initial fixation, subchondral bone preservation, and close apposition are key to pressfit success.
    • A hemispherical cup with a 1 to 2 mm pressfit demonstrates optimal fixation.
    • Adjunct fixation with screws or pegs shows limited benefit.

    Conclusions:

    • Pressfit fixation remains the primary and most effective method for acetabular component fixation.
    • A 1-2 mm pressfit range is recommended for achieving optimal stability and biologic incorporation.
    • Minimizing or avoiding adjunct fixation may be preferable in most pressfit scenarios.