Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging in the catheterization laboratory.

P Kearney1, R Erbel

  • 1Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

Current Opinion in Cardiology
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unexpected pain following SDF application.

British dental journal·2025
Same author

Identifying the needs for competency-based education in Europe: a needs assessment of cardiologists across 52 countries.

Journal of European CME·2018
Same author

Trends in percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography in Ireland, 2004-2011: Implications for Ireland and Europe.

International journal of cardiology. Heart & vessels·2018
Same author

Abstracts of the proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of the irish neurological association held on 25th-26th may, 1984.

Irish journal of medical science·2016
Same author

Cardiac syndrome X in Ireland: incidence and phenotype.

Irish journal of medical science·2015
Same author

Phosphorus recovery as AlPO4 from beneficially reused aluminium sludge arising from water treatment.

Environmental technology·2013
Same journal

An integrative approach to patient selection for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in secondary mitral regurgitation.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same journal

Rebooting blood vessel repair: implications of the SEMA-VR CardioLink-15 trial.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same journal

Advancements in wearable technology for heart failure patients.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive approaches to coronary artery bypass grafting: techniques, current evidence, and future directions.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same journal

Advances in artificial intelligence for the evaluation of mitral regurgitation.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
Same journal

Role of nutritional interventions to reduce cardiometabolic disease burden in the community.

Current opinion in cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Coronary angiography often inaccurately assesses interventions. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers superior imaging for coronary artery disease, complementing angiography in interventions and specific conditions like cardiac allograft arteriopathy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular imaging
  • Interventional cardiology
  • Medical device technology

Background:

  • Visual assessment of coronary interventions is frequently inaccurate.
  • Angiography has limitations in quantifying coronary lesions and diffuse disease.
  • Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) shows promise in overcoming angiography's limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate new algorithms for comprehensive coronary lesion assessment.
  • To compare the sensitivity of angiography and IVUS in detecting coronary artery disease.
  • To explore the clinical utility of IVUS in interventional cardiology.

Main Methods:

  • Development of new algorithms for lesion geometry, functional significance, and morphology assessment.
  • Utilizing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to study coronary wall and lumen changes post-angioplasty.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducting multicenter studies to determine the clinical utility of IVUS.
  • Main Results:

    • Angiography is inadequate for assessing mild to moderate coronary artery disease with vascular remodeling.
    • IVUS identifies complex changes like mural calcification and dissection, missed by angiography.
    • These features impact short- and long-term outcomes after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

    Conclusions:

    • IVUS provides a more comprehensive assessment of coronary lesions than angiography.
    • IVUS is crucial for detecting disease features affecting patient outcomes.
    • IVUS is expected to be integrated into coronary assessment, serving as a primary modality for specific indications and an adjunct to angiography.