Related Experiment Videos
US Medicaid drug formularies: do they work?
1Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Pharmacoeconomics
|December 10, 1991
Summary
Restricted drug formularies in state Medicaid programs may not save money. While drug costs decrease, increased service substitution elsewhere offsets these savings, negating the intended financial benefit.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Public Health Policy
- Pharmaceutical Policy
Background:
- State Medicaid programs often implement restricted drug formularies to control costs.
- These policies are typically justified by assumptions of efficient and cost-free operation.
- However, the real-world impact of these formularies requires careful examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether restricted drug formularies achieve actual cost savings in state Medicaid programs.
- To analyze the unintended consequences and spillover effects of implementing restricted formularies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of cost data within state Medicaid programs.
- Examination of drug expenditures and overall healthcare spending.
- Assessment of service substitution patterns resulting from formulary restrictions.
Main Results:
- Implementation of restricted formularies can lead to a reduction in direct drug expenditures.
- Significant increases in healthcare expenditures occur elsewhere in the system due to service substitution.
- The observed spillover effects completely offset any initial savings in the drug budget.
Conclusions:
- Restricted drug formularies in state Medicaid programs do not appear to generate net cost savings.
- The policy's intended financial benefits are undermined by increased costs in other service areas.
- Policymakers should consider the full system impact, including service substitution, when evaluating formulary restrictions.